Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) said:
> > It's true, but note that the XO software is technically
a "Remix"
> > rather than a "Spin", so there aren't any technical requirements
> > on it to satisfy the use of the Fedora mark. (I think I'd agree
> > with Greg's point regarding official Fedora spins.)
>
> But if it was such a concern with respect to the Fedora brand and
> image, I would think the same argument would apply, even if it
> was just branded as a 'Fedora remix'.
SoaS is not Fedora-branded in any way, AFAIK.
Yes, but how often have we touted XO, Sugar, et. al. as being 'based
on Fedora' over the past 4 years? Heck, you could argue it's gotten
more press than some of our official spins.
Bill