On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Alex Thomas <karlthane(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As it looks from my vantage point, the choice is either carry a patch
to revert this change in systemd, or accept the load of carrying an unknown
number of patches to allow other software to accommodate this change.
My suggestion is to plan on reverting the systemd change to
KillUserProcess=no in F25, and reevaluate for F26, when we have a better
understanding of just how many programs have to be rewritten/patched/forked
to accommodate this new paradigm.
As I understand it, this option has been available for a while, the change
in question is just to make it default. In which case the choice is between
letting it become default, or just setting the default back to off in