Re: Should bluez be in base, or split deps?
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler(a)chello.at) said:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Funny that kdebluetooth wins over bluez-gnome. I thought shortest wins,
> or is this an epoch thing?
AFAIK, bluez-gnome is obsoleted by gnome-bluetooth, which has a longer name
than kdebluetooth.
Then bluez-gnome either needs to be blocked, or not built (if it's a
subpackage.)
Bill