From: "Jiri Kucera" <jkucera(a)redhat.com>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 4:15:21 PM
Subject: [LEGAL] License field not match the content of eigen3-devel?
Hello,
I do some investigation of eigen3-devel package and found out that there are
some files distributed under the Minpack license:
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMcovar.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMonestep.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMpar.h
- /usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LMqrsolv.h
-
/usr/include/eigen3/unsupported/Eigen/src/LevenbergMarquardt/LevenbergMarquardt.h
There is no "minpack" identifier in the License field inside the eigen3.spec.
However, Minpack license claims itself to be BSD-like.
1. Should minpack be added to the License field or it is covered by the BSD
license identifier?
2. Are we really need to ship files in the eigen3-devel packages that are
marked as unsupported?
Regards,
Jiri
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure