On 01/28/2014 03:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 28 January 2014 18:43, Przemek Klosowski <przemek.klosowski@nist.gov> wrote:
There are two separate issues here: 'abandonment', and 'GUIness'. As to the
latter, I think it's a mistake to have a primary application installation
tool that only deals with GUI apps, because it relegates text-based tools,
such as 'units', to a second-class status of being hard to find and to
install.
That's not the tool we've designed and built. We've built a GUI
application installer, not a package installer.
While it's not the fault of the installer, I am concerned about that
distinction. For better or worse, a lot of useful tools seem to be out
of scope for a 'GUI application installer'. GCC, perl, git, octave, R,
units, mysql/sqlite3, this kind of thing.