Sometimes someone will propose that we've crossed the line when we
haven't, and usually we realize this and the proposal fails (excellent
example: the recentish "x86-64 micro-architecture update" proposal,
which met such universal raspberries it's probably not coming back for
a long time). It's possible that sometimes we get this call wrong,
we're only human. But it's wrong to suggest that decisions about what
we can and can't maintain, test and support are made for "no real
reason" or (as you suggested elsewhere) "arbitrarily". They aren't.
--

Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org