Re: Fedora 💔 Java: The Death of Two SIGs

[Miro Hrončok]

On 29. 09. 21 13:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>  On 26. 09. 21 21:20, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is
> > still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be removed?
> > Should the remaining ruins that used to be packages be orphaned?
> > Retired? Buried? Forgotten?
>  
>  Since many have moved this discussion away from this question, let me please 
>  bring back the main reason this was posted.
>  
>  Since the @java-maint-sig group is esentially non-responsive, I suggest we do 
>  the following:
>  
>  
>  1) We remove all BZ assignee overrides to @java-maint-sig. This is a must.
>  2) We remove access of @java-maint-sig from all packages.
>  3) We ask the members of the group if they want to admin the list/BZ account.
>     3a) We give it to the volunteer.
>     3b) We empty the group and cancel the BZ account/list if nobody shows up.
>  4) We *don't orphan the packages*, they have some "de jure" maintainers.
>  
>  The packages that fail to install and/or build will eventually die out due to 
>  the existing processes. 
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2672

-- 
Miro Hrončok
-- 
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok