On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:19 AM Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 30.6.2020 22:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
>> sd-boot is already installed on end users system, is light weight
>> compared to Grub ( sd-boot only supports uefi,smaller code size, easier
>> to maintain ).
> And that is exactly the problem, systemd-boot has only a small fraction of
> the feature set of GRUB. That is what makes it so small. I do not see what
> value it would provide over GRUB-EFI.
> In addition, as far as I know, systemd-boot is not compatible with the
> "Secure Boot" shim.
sd-boot works fine with secure boot but good point I'll add a test case
for that and check if it's not working.
Is that with self enrolled keys or is it now signed with the MS keys
through the official process?