On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 12:27:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/06/20 10:19 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:57:49 +0200, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > The dnf one works fine.
> It does not as I have shown. Moreover it takes so much time to do dnf command
> completion and one always has to ctrl-c it anyway. That is because dnf should
> use cached results updated by cron and do not contact network during
> interactive cache queries. If one really wants most fresh data there is
> --refresh for that.
That sounds like a good idea, and could be filed as a bug against
dnf. I'd prefer if it's optional though, because for me 'sudo dnf
install foo<TAB><TAB>' only takes seven seconds, not minutes, and
that seems reasonable to me.
Seven seconds sounds like a horrible user experience. I would lose
patience and start hitting ^C after around 3s.
Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->|
tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl 72->| 80->|