El jue., 25 jun. 2020 a las 21:45, Qiyu Yan (<yanqiyu(a)fedoraproject.org>)
What about to provide a prompt to the user telling them the
For example, when a new user to fedora first invokes git commit
without $EDITOR set, a program named fedora-default-editor comes up
and asks: Which editor do you like?
User can do his or hers choice and the choice will be remembered by
setting $EDITOR in his or hers ~/.bashrc
The fedora-default-editor can be a small script that shows user all
the difference and set $EDITOR for the user.
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Well, I strongy disagree whit this move.
In fact on of the things that I hate of Debian/Ubuntu is the choice of nano
and the poor version that they offer by default of vi.
More friendly for end-users? Really?
Please thinking so, the end-user use GUI's. Nano has no any significative
advantage over vi and even lesser over vim. What's the wrong with vim?
Really I don't understand.
If one end-user wants to use a text editor, he will find kate, gedit and
the like better options. If you don't like a modal editor, propose a better
option not a mediocre one. For example, micro is a non-modal editor but
more powerful that nano.
If has no real benefit, please could you reconsider it and let the
community give his voice?
Thanks in advance.
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org