From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 1:21:01 AM
Subject: Re: RFC: Feature process improvements
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> this proposal was recently linked in various places, so let's
> formally
> introduce it:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mmaslano/Feature_process
As discussed earlier, I liked the three-tier approach better, but I'm
in
favor of any improvement, which I think this clearly is.
I think we do need more clarity on "system-wide/defaults changing
features or
critical path components". What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM,
for a
specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical
path
component?
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
We were discussing even critpaths, but currently is in critical path
almost everything. Maybe splitting packages into tiers wouldn't be bad,
but I have no idea how to do it.
--
Marcela