Unless there are any issues with gpg, and to my knowledge there aren't, I can't
see any important reason to default 'gpg' to 'gpg2', at least not for
f24.
I will say that if this is done, we need to be able to use the normal alternatives system
(update-alternatives) to change what's used, without user changes worrying about being
in conflict with package updates.
On February 17, 2016 12:52:45 AM EST, Christopher <ctubbsii-fedora(a)apache.org>
wrote:
I just ran into this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309175
It's not a huge deal (and there are several workarounds, for git and
for
other tools which default ot using 'gpg'), but it highlights the
mismatch
between the default /usr/bin/gpg running gpg1, when other tools, like
gpg-agent, are tailored for gpg2.
RHEL/CentOS has shipped /usr/bin/gpg with gnupg2 since at least
sometime in
RHEL6.
I'm not saying we shouldn't continue to ship gnupg1, but can we at
least
rename it, so gnupg package is version 2, and gnupg1 provides
/usr/bin/gpg1
instead? This seems overdue. Is there any reason not to do this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Sent from my Android device. Please excuse my brevity.