----- Original Message -----
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:09:21PM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> > That sounds good. Maybe recast those ideas as three levels?
>> > - Critical Path Feature
>> > - Other Enhancement Feature
>> > - New Leaf Feature
>> We were thinking with a few folks more about "Self contained
>> feature"
>> but yeah, there's a lack of real definition.
>
> I think "Leaf" is better than "Self contained", since it's
unlikely
> for the
> feature to have zero outside dependencies. I think it'd be fine for
> such a
> feature to rely on small changes to existing packages (version
> updates,
> say).
I'd argue that this isn't a "feature" ... otherwise we could
advertise
every version upgrade as feature.
If it does not affect a large amount of users it is simply a version
upgrade not a "fedora feature".
The question is - how do you know if it affects large amount of users,
it's not an important one, without letting people know, there's such
feature?
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel