On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:05 AM Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote down the possible options and their pros and cons and I done my best to catch all the feedback here.
Thanks.
Another idea occurred to me, similar to "D" (use alternatives) and incorporates "A" (delete the current epel-8) for their to be something such as having a "mock-config-epel-default-base-rhel" and "mock-config-epel-default-base-alma" and "mock-config-epel-default-base-rocky" rpms (or whatever the agreed upon names would be) that would create the (raw?) epel-8 symlink, and conflict with each other. Then one is left discussing which of the various "Suggests: " or "Enhances: " specifiers would be appropriate and under what circumstances, perhaps such as a Suggests: (....base-alma if alma-release), and a Suggests: (...base-rocky if rocky-release) ???