On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:37 PM Alex Thomas <karlthane(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:25 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 6:11 PM Alex Thomas <karlthane(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Once question, are we looking at using a layout like openSUSE is
> > doing? ( https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:BTRFS
) utilizing subvolumes, or
> > are we looking at something like
> > /boot/efi > EFI (FAT32)
> > / > btrfs
> We are planning on using Fedora's current default layout, which has a
> subvolume for / and a subvolume for /home.
Ok, I thought I saw a proposal by you to change the default btrfs
layout to something like openSUSE's using subvolumes, but now, of
course, I cannot find it.
I have, at various points in the past couple of years, considered
different subvolume configurations. Right now, I'm keeping it simple
to our currently tested configuration: /boot on ext4, / and /home as
btrfs subvolumes on a single btrfs volume.
The only modification I may consider would be moving /boot to be btrfs
volume or subvolume, but that's contingent on some discussion with the
installer and bootloader teams.
However, the existing configuration works *very* well right now.
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!