Eric Sandeen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> David Chambers wrote:
>
>> Can't comment on SELinux, don't use it :-) :-)
> It doesn't matter whether you use it or not. SELinux support is
> important to this project and filesystem is a critical piece. If anyone
> is volunteering to support whatever features Fedora needs, test it and
> keep it updated, that's when XFS can be considered for being available
> for default.
I'm already getting xfs bugs & xfsprogs bugs from fedora - some I fix,
some I pass on to sgi, some are still unfixed - IOW, about like any
other fedora subsystem. ;)
I'd be happy to continue to look after xfs & userspace as well as I can
(given various time constraints) for fedora, and I'm sure the sgi guys
will offer backup support as they have been already.
Excellent!
David - Since Eric has been kind enough to step forward and fill this
role, can we expect to see XFS in the next test release, then? I would
assume it would be too late to get it into test1...
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan Yocum
Fermilab 630.840.6509
yocum(a)fnal.gov,
http://fermigrid.fnal.gov
Fermilab. Just zeros and ones.