-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 13:56 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> So I think F28/F29 would be best time for retiring YUM. Right now
> should be already stable and provide same capabilities (or
> that something will not be supported).
> Hopefully infrastructure / rel-eng folks will finally add support
> rich dependencies which would mean that yum will not work in
> anyway, so..
> Do you still have some critical missing functionality in DNF? And
> us know reasons why would you like to keep YUM available (hopefully
> there are no)!
There is still one thing I've noticed we're missing: API and CLI for
getting package changelogs. This exists in yum but doesn't in dnf.
agree that this is missing functionality, being honest I think
we should educate users to use updateinfo which is meant for users
while changelogs might be interested only for developers. Updateinfo is
coming from what is written in bodhi.
In addition, don't we still need yum in the repositories for mock to
target EL6 and EL7 for EPEL?
I don't think so, but better to ask developers of
blocked by this bug)
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
- -Igor Gnatenko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----