On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 17:13 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Martin Stransky <stransky(a)redhat.com>
>
wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm surprised that people use updates-testing for stable/production
> > > machines, have problem with handling the update and act like newbies.
> If
> > > you can't handle that, don't use that. Fedora is really a bleeding
> edge so
> > > don't complain you get new software with new features - even as
testing
> > > only :)
> > >
> > > Where is Matthew Miller when you need him? No one said anything about
> >
> > using updates-testing for stable/productioin machines. And the fact that
> > you're implying that Fedora itself is bleeding edge and not really suited
> > for production raises a huge red flag.
> >
> > i have no doubt when this whole situation is reviewed logical minds will
> > prevail, but in the meantime you've taken advantage of a loophole.
> > Congratulations.
>
> I think you're getting a bit needlessly confrontational at this point.
> The issue's been sufficiently well raised now. Let's try to move
> forward productively from here...
>
Exactly what is confrontational? I quoted his statement. Yes, the issue
has been raised.
Martin is apparently going to keep it in updates-testing because that's
what he wants to do.
It may or may not be reviewed - and he took advantage of a loophole. Since
when is in confrontational to summarize
facts?