Tom Lane writes:

Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@redhat.com> writes:

Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script

altogether?  or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it

breaks?

I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so

that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package

Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.