[root@ossus Survey2]# sudo dnf --releasever=30
--setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing
distro-sync
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 522 kB/s | 2.4 MB
00:04
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 99 B/s | 257 B
00:02
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates 207 B/s | 257 B
00:01
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 131 B/s | 257 B
00:01
Fedora 30 - x86_64 20 MB/s | 61 MB
00:03
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free - Updates 52 kB/s | 71 kB
00:01
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates'
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free 194 kB/s | 71 kB
00:00
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free'
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree - Updates 194 kB/s | 71 kB
00:00
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates'
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree 193 kB/s | 71 kB
00:00
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree'
Ignoring repositories: rpmfusion-free-updates, rpmfusion-free,
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, rpmfusion-nonfree
Error:
Problem 1: package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
rdma-core(x86-64) = 16.2-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
- rdma-core-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64
Problem 2: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
- fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
Problem 3: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
Problem 4: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
whois-nls = 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
- whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-repos(29)
= 1, but none of the providers can be installed
- package
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
- fedora-repos-29-3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch
Problem 6: package eclipse-cdt-2:9.6.0-5.fc30.x86_64 requires hamcrest,
but none of the providers can be installed
- problem with installed package eclipse-cdt-2:9.6.0-4.fc29.x86_64
- package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core =
1.3-25.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
- hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- eclipse-cdt-2:9.6.0-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- package hamcrest-core-1.3-25.fc30.noarch is excluded
Problem 7: package eclipse-epp-logging-2.0.7-6.fc30.noarch requires
osgi(org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient-cache), but none of the
providers can be installed
- problem with installed package eclipse-epp-logging-2.0.7-5.fc29.noarch
- package httpcomponents-client-cache-4.5.6-3.fc30.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient) = 4.5.6, but none of the
providers can be installed
- httpcomponents-client-cache-4.5.5-5.fc29.noarch does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- eclipse-epp-logging-2.0.7-5.fc29.noarch does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- package httpcomponents-client-4.5.6-3.fc30.noarch is excluded
Problem 8: package eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-3.fc30.noarch requires
maven-resolver-transport-file, but none of the providers can be installed
- package eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-3.fc30.noarch requires
osgi(org.apache.maven.resolver.transport.file), but none of the
providers can be installed
- problem with installed package eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-2.fc29.noarch
- package maven-resolver-transport-file-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-spi) = 1.3.1, but none of
the providers can be installed
- maven-resolver-transport-file-1:1.1.1-3.fc29.noarch does not belong
to a distupgrade repository
- eclipse-recommenders-2.5.4-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- package maven-resolver-spi-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch is excluded
Problem 9: problem with installed package
maven-resolver-transport-http-1:1.1.1-3.fc29.noarch
- package maven-resolver-transport-http-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-util) = 1.3.1, but none of
the providers can be installed
- maven-resolver-transport-http-1:1.1.1-3.fc29.noarch does not belong
to a distupgrade repository
- package maven-resolver-util-1:1.3.1-2.fc30.noarch is excluded
Problem 10: problem with installed package hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch
- package hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch requires hamcrest-core =
1.3-24.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
- package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core =
1.3-25.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
- hamcrest-core-1.3-24.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- package hamcrest-core-1.3-25.fc30.noarch is excluded
Problem 11: problem with installed package
system-config-firewall-1.2.29-21.fc29.noarch
- package system-config-firewall-1.2.29-21.fc29.noarch requires
python2-slip-dbus >= 0.2.7, but none of the providers can be installed
- python2-slip-dbus-0.6.4-12.fc29.noarch does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
On 2/28/19 11:05 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 02. 19 16:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 07:51 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 06:46 -0800, Tom London wrote:
>>> [root@localhost ~]# sudo dnf --releasever=30
>>> --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 --enablerepo=updates-testing
>>> distro-sync
>>> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 536 kB/s | 2.4 MB
>>> 00:04
>>> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 71 B/s | 257 B
>>> 00:03
>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Test Updates 67 B/s | 257 B
>>> 00:03
>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 62 B/s | 257 B
>>> 00:04
>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 7.4 MB/s | 61 MB
>>> 00:08
>>> Fedora 30 - x86_64 - VirtualBox 3.2 kB/s | 6.9 kB
>>> 00:02
>>> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'virtualbox'
>>> Ignoring repositories: virtualbox
>>> Error:
>>> Problem 1: package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
>>> libblockdev(x86-64) = 2.21-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be
>>> installed
>>> - libblockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
>>> repository
>>> - problem with installed package python2-blockdev-2.21-1.fc29.x86_64
>>
>>
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33105158 ought to
>> fix this.
>
> More generally, the *flood* of Python 2 dep issues here is something I
> was definitely concerned about with the Python 2 retirement policy
> explicitly deciding not to say anything about obsoleting Python 2
> subpackages :(
I wanted the py3 packages to obsolte the py2, but i was outvoted.
I now manually add those to fedora-obsoelte-packages, but I do it in
batches.
I wait for a compose now to make another batch (fora rawhide and f30).
--
--
www.diehlpk.de