On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:23 PM Iñaki Ucar <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 23:13, Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> In the weekly Fedora program update that I publish on
communityblog.fedoraproject.org, I have started to include a count of the open package
review requests. As of this moment, there are ~1300 open review requests. Some of these
were opened in 2006.
>
> The usual Bugzilla housekeeping (branching, EOL closure, etc) explicitly excludes
review request bugs. Having a large number of open, ancient review requests isn't
exactly harmful, but it's not very helpful either.
>
> Before I make a proposal to FPC, I thought I'd open a conversation here. What
does a reasonable cleanup of review requests look like?
Similar to other procedures for non-responsive people I guess: after a
timeout, set a flag and post a comment there, and if nobody steps up
to take it, close it.
> My initial thought is to close all review requests that were opened >2 years ago,
to be performed at the EOL closure for each release.
Sounds reasonable.
Iñaki
It sounds like you are both not aware that there's actually an
existing policy that covers stalled Review Requests:
Fabio
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: