esound.spec has a description thats\' out-of-date

Hello.

In esound.spec, line 2, the description

%define __os_install_post  /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress

should be

%define __os_install_post  /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress

isn't it?

Recent version of Red Hat Linux (and Fedora Core) doesn't have
/usr/lib/rpm/redhat
, and esound's build fails in default setting.

So, I think it would be better for all to be fixed esound.spec in esound's next
release...


Thanks

[Elliot Lee]

On 8 Nov 2003 jigorou3(a)mail.goo.ne.jp wrote:

>  Recent version of Red Hat Linux (and Fedora Core) doesn't have
>  /usr/lib/rpm/redhat
>  , and esound's build fails in default setting. 
Make sure to install the redhat-rpm-config package.

It does sound like esound.spec needs fixing, though. Please file a bug!
-- Elliot

[Tom Callaway]

On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 12:23, Elliot Lee wrote:
>  On 8 Nov 2003 jigorou3(a)mail.goo.ne.jp wrote:
>  
>  > Recent version of Red Hat Linux (and Fedora Core) doesn't have
>  > /usr/lib/rpm/redhat
>  > , and esound's build fails in default setting.
>  
>  Make sure to install the redhat-rpm-config package.
>  
>  It does sound like esound.spec needs fixing, though. Please file a bug! 
I filed this one back in October:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107781

Aurora tripped over this, because it doesn't have /usr/lib/rpm/redhat.

~spot
---
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> LCA, RHCE 
Red Hat Sales Engineer || Aurora SPARC Linux Project Leader

"The author's mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is
novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present
social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive. Not to
be published." -- Aldous Huxley

[Matthias Saou]

jigorou3(a)mail.goo.ne.jp wrote :

>  In esound.spec, line 2, the description
>  
>  %define __os_install_post  /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
>  
>  should be
>  
>  %define __os_install_post  /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
>  
>  isn't it?
>  
>  Recent version of Red Hat Linux (and Fedora Core) doesn't have
>  /usr/lib/rpm/redhat
>  , and esound's build fails in default setting.
>  
>  So, I think it would be better for all to be fixed esound.spec in
>  esound's next release... 
I think  the "redhat" sub-directory and its files come from the
"redhat-rpm-config" package, which is responsible for quite a few things
regarding package builds.
Now the real question would be : "Why define that brp-compress instead of
leaving the default?"... to avoid stripping, maybe?

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow) - Linux kernel 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl
Load : 0.19 0.42 0.85

[Michael Schwendt]

On 8 Nov 2003 03:00:00 +0900, jigorou3(a)mail.goo.ne.jp wrote:

>  In esound.spec, line 2, the description
>  
>  %define __os_install_post  /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
>  
>  should be
>  
>  %define __os_install_post  /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
>  
>  isn't it?
>  
>  Recent version of Red Hat Linux (and Fedora Core) doesn't have
>  /usr/lib/rpm/redhat
>  , and esound's build fails in default setting. 
Not true.

$ rpm --redhatprovides /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
redhat-rpm-config-8.0.28-1.1

--