On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 14:42 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 09:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 16:00 +0300, Nikolay Vladimirov wrote:
> > The change just provides some backward compatibility. It's minimal.
> > I really think it's not important why the change was made. Since it
> > doesn't break anything and it doesn't waste disk space. It may be
> > useful for some dead opensource projects that use the older version.
> There are better ways to do this. Providing a compat-curl package is
> the proper way. The way it was done now is just a hack with the sole
> intention of making flash work again.
A compat-curl project that would contain duplicated/unmaintained code?
What's the point of this since libcurl didn't break ABI, and only
What's the point of adding it at all then? If the ABI didn't change,
then apps can just rebuild against the newer libcurl.
This is getting a bit too far.
I don't think it is. But if I'm overridden by FESCo, I won't continue
to make a fuss.