The new graphical boot process is purdy keen... However, it could use one little change to increase its overall usability.
As the progess bar moves from left to right, the name of the service that is attempting to start is shown for a few seconds then faded away. This is nice eyecandy, but it's really inconvenient if a particular service is taking forever or hanging indefinately.
If I'm not lucky enough to catch the name of the service in the few seconds before it fades away, I'll have no idea what's going wrong 'til I reboot and devote 100% of my attention to watching the names of the services before they fade away.
I brought this up in #fedora-devel, but thought I'd post to the mailing list so this issue actually gets some attention.
In #fedora-devel someone suggested that instead of the names fading away after a few seconds, they could fade from one into the next. That sounds like a much more sensible option if we really want fading eyecandy.
Okay, I'm done now,
Derek
On Sep 26, 2003, "Derek P. Moore" derek.moore@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Okay, I'm done now,
Not before it makes it to bugzilla :-)
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 14:38, Derek P. Moore wrote:
The new graphical boot process is purdy keen... However, it could use one little change to increase its overall usability.
As the progess bar moves from left to right, the name of the service that is attempting to start is shown for a few seconds then faded away. This is nice eyecandy, but it's really inconvenient if a particular service is taking forever or hanging indefinately.
If I'm not lucky enough to catch the name of the service in the few seconds before it fades away, I'll have no idea what's going wrong 'til I reboot and devote 100% of my attention to watching the names of the services before they fade away.
Did /var/log/bootlog go away??
Here is what mine said when things failed: ============================= Sep 1 12:12:10 locutus sshd: succeeded Sep 1 12:12:08 locutus network: Bringing up interface eth0: succeeded Sep 1 12:12:11 locutus crond: crond startup succeeded Sep 1 12:12:12 locutus xfs: xfs startup succeeded Sep 1 12:12:12 locutus anacron: anacron startup succeeded Sep 1 13:18:46 locutus cupsd: cupsd: Child exited with status 1! Sep 1 13:18:46 locutus cups: cupsd startup succeeded Sep 1 13:18:58 locutus cups: cupsd startup succeeded Sep 1 16:52:09 locutus postgresql: Starting postgresql service: succeeded Sep 5 11:47:40 locutus iptables: failed Sep 5 11:47:40 locutus iptables: failed Sep 5 11:47:41 locutus iptables: succeeded Sep 6 22:22:58 locutus smb: smbd shutdown failed Sep 6 22:22:58 locutus smb: nmbd shutdown failed Sep 6 22:22:58 locutus smb: smbd startup succeeded Sep 6 22:22:58 locutus smb: nmbd startup succeeded Sep 6 22:23:38 locutus smb: smbd shutdown succeeded ===============================
I hope it didn't go away, I've got scripts that monitor that file and email me if there were failures.
If I'm not lucky enough to catch the name of the service in the few seconds before it fades away, I'll have no idea what's going wrong 'til I reboot and devote 100% of my attention to watching the names of the services before they fade away.
Had the same problem myself while trying to see what was taking so long
In #fedora-devel someone suggested that instead of the names fading away after a few seconds, they could fade from one into the next. That sounds like a much more sensible option if we really want fading eyecandy.
That sounds good
"Derek P. Moore" derek.moore@sbcglobal.net writes:
As the progess bar moves from left to right, the name of the service that is attempting to start is shown for a few seconds then faded away. This is nice eyecandy, but it's really inconvenient if a particular service is taking forever or hanging indefinately.
Only 'interesting' services are shown -- the vast majority of them are not. The point of the fade is to prevent you thinking that it hung on a step that it didn't actually hang on. That being said -- it should only fade if it has gotten past that stage. I've been meaning to make that change to the code for a while.
-Jonathan