Announce: OpenCV 3.1 in Rawhide

[Pavel Kajaba]

Hello,

We are going to change version of OpenCV from 2.x to 3.x [1].

It's really a big change, so there is quite high chance that something
will break in process :(

It seems that these packages are dependent on openCV:

cinnamon updates
digikam updates
fawkes updates
frei0r-plugins fedora
gmic updates-testing
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free updates
kf5-libkface updates-testing
libfreenect updates
libkface fedora
mrpt fedora
nomacs updates
opencfu fedora
OpenImageIO updates
os-autoinst updates
php-facedetect fedora
player fedora
python-SimpleCV fedora
shogun updates
simarrange fedora
simon fedora

lives @System
ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
mlt rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
vlc rpmfusion-free-updates-testing

gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free

We tried to compile them [2] so you can check out results and try to
build again openCV 3.1.

Pavel

[1] http://opencv.org/opencv-3-1.html
[2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/builds/

[Richard Shaw]

It's interesting that OpenImageIO failed for f24 but succeeded for rawhide.
Could it be a gcc 6 issue? It looks like f24 is release 0.15 and rawhide is
0.17 at the time of build.

Thanks,
Richard

[Pavel Kajaba]

There were issues with mock while building. Some packages failed even
if they should not.
About OpenImageIO - it's strange, but I did not investigate it. I will
look into it.
Pavel.
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 09:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> It's interesting that OpenImageIO failed for f24 but succeeded for
> rawhide. Could it be a gcc 6 issue? It looks like f24 is release 0.15
> and rawhide is 0.17 at the time of build.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> --
> devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail].
> org

[Sérgio Basto]

On Qua, 2016-04-06 at 09:27 +0200, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are going to change version of OpenCV from 2.x to 3.x [1].
>
> It's really a big change, so there is quite high chance that
> something
> will break in process :(
>
> It seems that these packages are dependent on openCV:
>
> cinnamon updates
> digikam updates
> fawkes updates
> frei0r-plugins fedora
> gmic updates-testing
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free updates
> kf5-libkface updates-testing
> libfreenect updates
> libkface fedora
> mrpt fedora
> nomacs updates
> opencfu fedora
> OpenImageIO updates
> os-autoinst updates
> php-facedetect fedora
> player fedora
> python-SimpleCV fedora
> shogun updates
> simarrange fedora
> simon fedora
>
> lives @System
> ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
> mlt rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
> vlc rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
>
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
>
> We tried to compile them [2] so you can check out results and try to
> build again openCV 3.1.
>
> Pavel
>
> [1] http://opencv.org/opencv-3-1.html
> [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/builds/

if no objections I will commit and build openCV 3.1 in rawhide today !

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230078

Patch proposed here: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1149283

Best regards,

[Sérgio Basto]

Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :

Deps of opencv-core:
OpenImageIO
digikam
fawkes
frei0r-plugins
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
kf5-libkface
libfreenect
libkface
mrpt
nomacs
opencfu
os-autoinst
player
simarrange
simon

Deps of opencv:
php-facedetect

Deps of opencv-python:
cinnamon
python-SimpleCV

Deps of opencv-devel:
shogun

On Qui, 2016-04-21 at 19:06 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>

On Qua, 2016-04-06 at 09:27 +0200, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are going to change version of OpenCV from 2.x to 3.x [1].
> >
> > It's really a big change, so there is quite high chance that
> > something
> > will break in process :(
> >
> > It seems that these packages are dependent on openCV:
> >
> > cinnamon updates
> > digikam updates
> > fawkes updates
> > frei0r-plugins fedora
> > gmic updates-testing
> > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free updates
> > kf5-libkface updates-testing
> > libfreenect updates
> > libkface fedora
> > mrpt fedora
> > nomacs updates
> > opencfu fedora
> > OpenImageIO updates
> > os-autoinst updates
> > php-facedetect fedora
> > player fedora
> > python-SimpleCV fedora
> > shogun updates
> > simarrange fedora
> > simon fedora
> >
> > lives @System
> > ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
> > mlt rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
> > vlc rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
> >
> > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> >
> > We tried to compile them [2] so you can check out results and try
> > to
> > build again openCV 3.1.
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > [1] http://opencv.org/opencv-3-1.html
> > [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/builds/
>
> if no objections I will commit and build openCV 3.1 in rawhide today
> !
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230078
>
> Patch proposed here: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1149283
>
> Best regards,

[Adam Williamson]

On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
>  
> os-autoinst

Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.

[Sérgio Basto]

On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
> >  
> > os-autoinst
>
> Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.

How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
> > >  
> > > os-autoinst
> > Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
> How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?

The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
> > > >
> > > > os-autoinst
> > >
> > > Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
> >
> > How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
>
> The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.

You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it does
not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/

V.

[Sérgio Basto]

On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
> > > > >  
> > > > > os-autoinst
> > > >
> > > > Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
> > >
> > > How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
> >
> > The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken
> > deps.
>
> You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it
> does
> not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/

yes, that is my point , email with reports don't report broken deps,
but we could have somewhere that reports of broken deps ..., have we ? 
If we don't have the reports how I could check broken deps in rawhide (
without install all rawhide )

Thanks,

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 18:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > > > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > os-autoinst
> > > > >
> > > > > Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
> > > >
> > > > How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
> > >
> > > The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken
> > > deps.
> >
> > You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it
> > does
> > not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/
>
> yes, that is my point , email with reports don't report broken deps,
> but we could have somewhere that reports of broken deps ..., have we ? 
> If we don't have the reports how I could check broken deps in rawhide (
> without install all rawhide )

Ah, sorry. I hadn't noticed. Well, here's one thing you can look at
(Dennis may have a better idea):

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-/logs/globa...

I'm not sure when that 'latest-Fedora-' symlink is updated so I dunno
if that URL will always be valid; you can always go to
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/%C2%A0and poke into the
latest completed compose from there (check the STATUS file, look for
FINISHED_INCOMPLETE or FINISHED) and then open that log file. The
'Everything' tree repoclosure should be pretty close to a full list of
broken deps, I *think*.

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2016-04-26 at 10:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 18:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > > > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > > On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > os-autoinst
> > > > > > Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
> > > > >
> > > > > How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
> > > >
> > > > The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken
> > > > deps.
> > >
> > > You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since
> > > it
> > > does
> > > not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/
> >
> > yes, that is my point , email with reports don't report broken
> > deps,
> > but we could have somewhere that reports of broken deps ..., have
> > we ? 
> > If we don't have the reports how I could check broken deps in
> > rawhide (
> > without install all rawhide )
>
> Ah, sorry. I hadn't noticed. Well, here's one thing you can look at
> (Dennis may have a better idea):
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-/log
> s/global/repoclosure-builddeps.global.log
>
> I'm not sure when that 'latest-Fedora-' symlink is updated so I dunno
> if that URL will always be valid; you can always go to
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/%C2%A0and poke into the
> latest completed compose from there (check the STATUS file, look for
> FINISHED_INCOMPLETE or FINISHED) and then open that log file. The
> 'Everything' tree repoclosure should be pretty close to a full list
> of
> broken deps, I *think*.

It is here: [1] what I'm looking for

Thanks,

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20160426.n...

[Kevin Fenzi]

FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports
to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that
calls pungi4 for us).

I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so
hopefully tomorrow it should be back to sending the broken deps
reports.

kevin

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 27.4.2016 v 18:59 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports
> to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that
> calls pungi4 for us).
>
> I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so
> hopefully tomorrow it should be back to sending the broken deps
> reports.

It seems it works now. Thx Kevin.

Vít