Hello,
We are going to change version of OpenCV from 2.x to 3.x [1].
It's really a big change, so there is quite high chance that something will break in process :(
It seems that these packages are dependent on openCV:
cinnamon updates digikam updates fawkes updates frei0r-plugins fedora gmic updates-testing gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free updates kf5-libkface updates-testing libfreenect updates libkface fedora mrpt fedora nomacs updates opencfu fedora OpenImageIO updates os-autoinst updates php-facedetect fedora player fedora python-SimpleCV fedora shogun updates simarrange fedora simon fedora
lives @System ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-updates-testing mlt rpmfusion-free-updates-testing vlc rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
We tried to compile them [2] so you can check out results and try to build again openCV 3.1.
Pavel
[1] http://opencv.org/opencv-3-1.html [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/builds/
It's interesting that OpenImageIO failed for f24 but succeeded for rawhide. Could it be a gcc 6 issue? It looks like f24 is release 0.15 and rawhide is 0.17 at the time of build.
Thanks, Richard
There were issues with mock while building. Some packages failed even if they should not. About OpenImageIO - it's strange, but I did not investigate it. I will look into it. Pavel. On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 09:05 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
It's interesting that OpenImageIO failed for f24 but succeeded for rawhide. Could it be a gcc 6 issue? It looks like f24 is release 0.15 and rawhide is 0.17 at the time of build.
Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject. org
On Qua, 2016-04-06 at 09:27 +0200, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
Hello,
We are going to change version of OpenCV from 2.x to 3.x [1].
It's really a big change, so there is quite high chance that something will break in process :(
It seems that these packages are dependent on openCV:
cinnamon updates digikam updates fawkes updates frei0r-plugins fedora gmic updates-testing gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free updates kf5-libkface updates-testing libfreenect updates libkface fedora mrpt fedora nomacs updates opencfu fedora OpenImageIO updates os-autoinst updates php-facedetect fedora player fedora python-SimpleCV fedora shogun updates simarrange fedora simon fedora
lives @System ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-updates-testing mlt rpmfusion-free-updates-testing vlc rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
We tried to compile them [2] so you can check out results and try to build again openCV 3.1.
Pavel
[1] http://opencv.org/opencv-3-1.html [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/builds/
if no objections I will commit and build openCV 3.1 in rawhide today !
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230078
Patch proposed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1149283
Best regards,
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
Deps of opencv-core: OpenImageIO digikam fawkes frei0r-plugins gmic gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free kf5-libkface libfreenect libkface mrpt nomacs opencfu os-autoinst player simarrange simon
Deps of opencv: php-facedetect
Deps of opencv-python: cinnamon python-SimpleCV
Deps of opencv-devel: shogun
On Qui, 2016-04-21 at 19:06 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2016-04-06 at 09:27 +0200, Pavel Kajaba wrote:
Hello,
We are going to change version of OpenCV from 2.x to 3.x [1].
It's really a big change, so there is quite high chance that something will break in process :(
It seems that these packages are dependent on openCV:
cinnamon updates digikam updates fawkes updates frei0r-plugins fedora gmic updates-testing gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free updates kf5-libkface updates-testing libfreenect updates libkface fedora mrpt fedora nomacs updates opencfu fedora OpenImageIO updates os-autoinst updates php-facedetect fedora player fedora python-SimpleCV fedora shogun updates simarrange fedora simon fedora
lives @System ffmpeg rpmfusion-free-updates-testing mlt rpmfusion-free-updates-testing vlc rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
We tried to compile them [2] so you can check out results and try to build again openCV 3.1.
Pavel
[1] http://opencv.org/opencv-3-1.html [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/opencv/builds/
if no objections I will commit and build openCV 3.1 in rawhide today !
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230078
Patch proposed here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1149283
Best regards,
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst
Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst
Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst
Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.
Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide :
os-autoinst
Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.
You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it does not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/
V.
On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst
Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.
You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it does not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/
yes, that is my point , email with reports don't report broken deps, but we could have somewhere that reports of broken deps ..., have we ? If we don't have the reports how I could check broken deps in rawhide ( without install all rawhide )
Thanks,
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 18:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : os-autoinst
Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.
You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it does not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/
yes, that is my point , email with reports don't report broken deps, but we could have somewhere that reports of broken deps ..., have we ? If we don't have the reports how I could check broken deps in rawhide ( without install all rawhide )
Ah, sorry. I hadn't noticed. Well, here's one thing you can look at (Dennis may have a better idea):
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-/logs/globa...
I'm not sure when that 'latest-Fedora-' symlink is updated so I dunno if that URL will always be valid; you can always go to https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/%C2%A0and poke into the latest completed compose from there (check the STATUS file, look for FINISHED_INCOMPLETE or FINISHED) and then open that log file. The 'Everything' tree repoclosure should be pretty close to a full list of broken deps, I *think*.
On Ter, 2016-04-26 at 10:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 18:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2016-04-25 at 12:46 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25.4.2016 v 07:08 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 02:27 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sáb, 2016-04-23 at 07:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 03:32 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Hello we need rebuild in rawhide : > > os-autoinst Just sent this, sorry, I missed the announce.
How we know the broken deps that we have on rawhide ?
The daily 'compose report' emails contain a full list of broken deps.
You wanted to say "should" or "used to" contain I assume, since it does not contain the log for several days/weeks already :/
yes, that is my point , email with reports don't report broken deps, but we could have somewhere that reports of broken deps ..., have we ? If we don't have the reports how I could check broken deps in rawhide ( without install all rawhide )
Ah, sorry. I hadn't noticed. Well, here's one thing you can look at (Dennis may have a better idea):
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/latest-Fedora-/log s/global/repoclosure-builddeps.global.log
I'm not sure when that 'latest-Fedora-' symlink is updated so I dunno if that URL will always be valid; you can always go to https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/%C2%A0and poke into the latest completed compose from there (check the STATUS file, look for FINISHED_INCOMPLETE or FINISHED) and then open that log file. The 'Everything' tree repoclosure should be pretty close to a full list of broken deps, I *think*.
It is here: [1] what I'm looking for
Thanks,
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20160426.n...
FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that calls pungi4 for us).
I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so hopefully tomorrow it should be back to sending the broken deps reports.
kevin
Dne 27.4.2016 v 18:59 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
FYI, The reason rawhide composes were not sending broken deps reports to the lists or developers was a bug in fedora-pungi (The script that calls pungi4 for us).
I tracked down the issue and submitted a PR which Dennis merged, so hopefully tomorrow it should be back to sending the broken deps reports.
It seems it works now. Thx Kevin.
Vít