Hello,
the jq package currently has an unfortunate issue with handling large integers:
$ echo '{"a":9011153322235679}' | jq '.a' 9011153322235680
I reported this in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979 a while ago and put up a PR at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jq/pull-request/4 to fix it. I think it'd be nice to get this merged and built before Fedora 35 releases if possible. For reference, the equivalent PR has already been merged in CentOS Stream 9 (https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/jq/-/merge_requests/1).
Cheers Davide
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:29 PM Davide Cavalca via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello,
the jq package currently has an unfortunate issue with handling large integers:
$ echo '{"a":9011153322235679}' | jq '.a' 9011153322235680
I reported this in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979 a while ago and put up a PR at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jq/pull-request/4 to fix it. I think it'd be nice to get this merged and built before Fedora 35 releases if possible. For reference, the equivalent PR has already been merged in CentOS Stream 9 (https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/jq/-/merge_requests/1).
I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been requested and accepted as an FE for F35 and the maintainers haven't done anything yet.
-- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 18:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been requested and accepted as an FE for F35 and the maintainers haven't done anything yet.
Thanks, I have proposed this as a Freeze Exception: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979#c2
Cheers Davide
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 23:00 +0000, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 18:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been requested and accepted as an FE for F35 and the maintainers haven't done anything yet.
Thanks, I have proposed this as a Freeze Exception: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979#c2
The FE for this has been accepted for F35: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979#c3
Cheers Davide
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:38 PM Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 23:00 +0000, Davide Cavalca via devel wrote:
On Wed, 2021-10-13 at 18:53 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
I can pick this up as a provenpackager tomorrow if this has been requested and accepted as an FE for F35 and the maintainers haven't done anything yet.
Thanks, I have proposed this as a Freeze Exception: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979#c2
The FE for this has been accepted for F35: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008979#c3
I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma:
* F35: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9 * F34: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdc2cb4c5a * F33: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f727442f9b
On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 22:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma:
- F35:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9
- F34:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdc2cb4c5a
- F33:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f727442f9b
Thanks! These all look good to me.
Cheers Davide
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:20 AM Davide Cavalca dcavalca@fb.com wrote:
On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 22:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
I've gone ahead and done it, it needs karma:
- F35:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab44a1d0c9
- F34:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cdc2cb4c5a
- F33:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-f727442f9b
Thanks! These all look good to me.
The F35 one needs additional karma to queue for stable.
-
Davide Cavalca -
Neal Gompa