package files marked as documentation

[Gianluca Sforna]

Hi, I am striving to understand why in the mantis package (a php
application) most files are marked as documentation [1] though they
are not.
I am quite sure there isa stupid mistake in the spec file[1], but I'm
not able to locate it.

Any help appreciated.


[1] or ,at least, that's what "rpm -q --docfiles mantis" reports.
[2] http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mantis/mantis.spec?rev=1.16&am...

[Jason L Tibbitts III]

> >>>> "GS" == Gianluca Sforna
> <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; writes: 
GS> Hi, I am striving to understand why in the mantis package (a php
GS> application) most files are marked as documentation [1] though
GS> they are not.

Funny.  Note how "/usr/share/mantis" looks a lot like
"/usr/share/man".

GS> I am quite sure there isa stupid mistake in the spec file[1], but
GS> I'm not able to locate it.

Nope, looks like an RPM bug.

 - J<

[Panu Matilainen]

On Thu, 4 Jul 2007, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

> >>>>> "GS" == Gianluca Sforna
> <giallu(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:
>
>  GS> Hi, I am striving to understand why in the mantis package (a php
>  GS> application) most files are marked as documentation [1] though
>  GS> they are not.
>
>  Funny.  Note how "/usr/share/mantis" looks a lot like
> "/usr/share/man".
>
>  GS> I am quite sure there isa stupid mistake in the spec file[1], but
>  GS> I'm not able to locate it.
>
>  Nope, looks like an RPM bug. 
Indeed. Please bugzilla this.

 	- Panu -

[Gianluca Sforna]

On 7/5/07, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)laiskiainen.org&gt; wrote:
>  > GS> I am quite sure there isa stupid mistake in the spec
> file[1], but
>  > GS> I'm not able to locate it.
>  >
>  > Nope, looks like an RPM bug.
>
>  Indeed. Please bugzilla this. 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246819

thanks for your help.