On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 11:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 10:28 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:51:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 15:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:32:29PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > In general there's usecases where a low resource desktop is
> > > > > such on devices with only 1Gb of RAM where Workstation
> > > > > a good experience.
> > > >
> > > > I definitely agree that there's value in providing for such
usecases, but I
> > > > also think there's value in defining that as outside of
> > > > and using another name for that offering -- whether just Fedora XFCE
> > > > other.
> > >
> > > That's what's proposed here, AFAICS. There doesn't seem to be
> > > indication that this would be Workstation-branded. It's just bringing
> > > up an existing spin on another arch, essentially.
> > That is correct, there's no intention of branding this as Workstation.
> > This is purely bringing the XFCE spin as a pre-built image
> OK. The Change text is clearly confusing in this regards, because it doesn't
> mention "XFCE spin" anywhere.
The summary is "Add an AArch64 Xfce Desktop spin disk image to
deliverables in Fedora 31."
Oh, actually, that was changed after you wrote your mail. Damn wikis :P
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net