Building subversion javahl bindings

[Pedro Lamarão]

I've got this patch to subversion.spec that allows optional building of 
javahl bindings with a variable-specified JDK path.
I've built it as I need Subclipse to work.
What do you all think?

--
 Pedro Lamarão

[David Hollis]

On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 11:39 -0200, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
>  I've got this patch to subversion.spec that allows optional
> building of 
>  javahl bindings with a variable-specified JDK path.
>  I've built it as I need Subclipse to work.
>  What do you all think?
>   
You may be able to get buy without having to explicitly set the path to
the JDK if you use the jpackage.org JVM setup.  It makes use of the
alternatives system so my /usr/bin/java winds up pointing
to /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.5.0-sun/bin/java.  Since RH is working with the
jpackage.org folks, it may be a good way to go.

Just a thought.

-- 
David Hollis <dhollis(a)davehollis.com&gt;

[Anthony Green]

On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 11:39 -0200, Pedro Lamarão wrote:
>  I've got this patch to subversion.spec that allows optional
> building of 
>  javahl bindings with a variable-specified JDK path.
>  I've built it as I need Subclipse to work.
>  What do you all think? 
I modified this patch to build javahl unconditionally with java-gcj-
compat.

I hit a couple of stumbling blocks.  I think fitzsim is fixing one of
them in java-gcj-compat (symlinking GCC's jni.h into java-gcj-compat's
JAVA_HOME), and this one in gcjh:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19742

Otherwise, it builds just fine.  Hopefully both of these will be taken
care of in short order.

AG