Hi Lennart,
In this thread:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-June/004215.ht...
You express that the module-pipe-sink is a toy, and can't be used for anything useful, and that you're going to remove it from the Fedora packages.
And, indeed, it has been removed from the Fedora packages; the .spec file removes the pipe sink and source (along with oss and the old detect module).
I couldn't find any other discussion of this removal; please forgive me and supply links if I did not Google well or long enough to find it.
However, I would like to play with your toy <grin>. Specifically, the module-pipe-sink proved to be a useful tool in feeding sound into an Xspice virtual session. Each session gets a virtual X display, and we now have code in spice to consume the fifo and translate it into spice sound protocol messages.
I was preparing an Xspice demo as part of the Fedora 19 test process, and sound is one of the key benefits of spice.
I am hoping to persuade you to undo those removals, or failing that, to persuade you to create a new package (named pulseaudio-toys, perhaps <grin>).
Cheers,
Jeremy
Jeremy White wrote:
In this thread:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-June/004215.ht...
You express that the module-pipe-sink is a toy, and can't be used for anything useful, and that you're going to remove it from the Fedora packages.
And, indeed, it has been removed from the Fedora packages; the .spec file removes the pipe sink and source (along with oss and the old detect module).
..
I am hoping to persuade you to undo those removals, or failing that, to persuade you to create a new package (named pulseaudio-toys, perhaps <grin>).
Mind filing a RFE bug requesting such @ bugzilla.redhat.com?
(Once we have that and there are no objections, I can help implement the packaging)
-- rex
Mind filing a RFE bug requesting such @ bugzilla.redhat.com?
Sure; it's here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958949
Cheers,
Jeremy