On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:59 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Is the problem that the gecko-libs dependency is not arch-specific?
Well, there are a few more candidate dependencies; but that seems like
the most likely one.
Or did you have something else in mind?
> How do we fix that?
Well, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if no one using gecko-libs
does that; though if what you're suggesting is correct, I suspect nearly
everyone needs to.
But why does yum assume that a dependency of an x86_64 package can be
satisfied by an i586 one?
Braden McDaniel <braden(a)endoframe.com>