Hi everyone,
I am preparing a rebase for the shadow package in Rawhide. This update includes a libsubid library version bump (SONAME bump).
To prevent breaking the ecosystem, I have successfully built the new shadow package inside an isolated side-tag: f45-build-side-144465. The build repository has already been regenerated and is ready.
According to repoqueries, the following packages need to be rebuilt against the new library version inside this side-tag:
-
apptainer -
buildah -
podman -
skopeo
*Maintainers:* Can you please bump the release of your respective packages and trigger a build targeting this side-tag? You can do this by running:
fedpkg build --target=f45-build-side-144465
Once all dependent packages successfully build in the side-tag, I will submit the Bodhi update to pull everything into Rawhide simultaneously.
Apologies, I messed up the bodhi creation and separate updates were created . Seems apptainer got pushed to stable despite adding negative karma. I have unpushed podman, buildah and skopeo so we're ok there. shadow-utils seems to have failed gating so we should be ok there too.
@dwd, would you mind doing a rebuild to that sidetag please?
I suspect we may need a rebuild for shadow-utils as well.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 9:04 AM Iker Pedrosa ipedrosa@redhat.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am preparing a rebase for the shadow package in Rawhide. This update includes a libsubid library version bump (SONAME bump).
To prevent breaking the ecosystem, I have successfully built the new shadow package inside an isolated side-tag: f45-build-side-144465. The build repository has already been regenerated and is ready.
According to repoqueries, the following packages need to be rebuilt against the new library version inside this side-tag:
apptainer
buildah
podman
skopeo
*Maintainers:* Can you please bump the release of your respective packages and trigger a build targeting this side-tag? You can do this by running:
fedpkg build --target=f45-build-side-144465
Once all dependent packages successfully build in the side-tag, I will submit the Bodhi update to pull everything into Rawhide simultaneously. --
Iker Pedrosa
Senior Software Engineer, Identity Management team
Red Hat https://www.redhat.com
Txapela (gorria) buruan eta ibili munduan
(Red) hat on his head and walk the world
Basque proverb https://www.redhat.com
On 7/23/26 8:03 AM, Iker Pedrosa via devel wrote:
I am preparing a rebase for the shadow package in Rawhide. This update includes a libsubid library version bump (SONAME bump).
To prevent breaking the ecosystem, I have successfully built the new shadow package inside an isolated side-tag: f45-build-side-144465. The build repository has already been regenerated and is ready.
Thank you for announcing and working on this!
According to repoqueries, the following packages need to be rebuilt against the new library version inside this side-tag:
$ fedrq wr 'libsubid.so.5()(64bit)' -F source -X apptainer buildah podman shadow-utils singularity-ce skopeo
$ koji list-tagged f45-build-side-144465> Build Tag Built by
apptainer-1.5.3-3.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 dwd buildah-1.45.0-2.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 lsm5 containers-common-0.69.0-1.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 packit podman-6.1.0~rc1-1.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 lsm5 shadow-utils-4.20.0-1.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 ipedrosa shadow-utils-4.20.0.rc3-1.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 ipedrosa skopeo-1.24.0-2.fc45 f45-build-side-144465 lsm5
It looks like singularity-ce still needs to be rebuilt here, and there are two builds of shadow-utils in the sidetag, so one of them needs to be untagged before the sidetag can be submitted to Bodhi and merged.
On 7/31/26 4:34 PM, Maxwell G wrote:
It looks like singularity-ce still needs to be rebuilt here, and there are two builds of shadow-utils in the sidetag, so one of them needs to be untagged before the sidetag can be submitted to Bodhi and merged.
I submitted a rebuild for singularity-ce [1] and untagged shadow-utils-4.20.0.rc3-1.fc45 in favor of shadow-utils-4.20.0-1.fc45.
[1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=148533045
Thanks all for handling this!
I'm trying to submit a bodhi update (this time hopefully the right way), but it's not letting me, saying I don't have commit access to apptainer, shadow-utils and singularity-ce.
Maybe only the sidetag owner (Iker / shadow-utils team) can create this?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 5:39 PM Maxwell G maxwell@gtmx.me wrote:
On 7/31/26 4:34 PM, Maxwell G wrote:
It looks like singularity-ce still needs to be rebuilt here, and there are two builds of shadow-utils in the sidetag, so one of them needs to be untagged before the sidetag can be submitted to Bodhi and merged.
I submitted a rebuild for singularity-ce [1] and untagged shadow-utils-4.20.0.rc3-1.fc45 in favor of shadow-utils-4.20.0-1.fc45.
Seems shadow-utils maintainers can't create the bodhi either.
I filed https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 .
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 8:41 AM Lokesh Mandvekar lsm5@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks all for handling this!
I'm trying to submit a bodhi update (this time hopefully the right way), but it's not letting me, saying I don't have commit access to apptainer, shadow-utils and singularity-ce.
Maybe only the sidetag owner (Iker / shadow-utils team) can create this?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 5:39 PM Maxwell G maxwell@gtmx.me wrote:
On 7/31/26 4:34 PM, Maxwell G wrote:
It looks like singularity-ce still needs to be rebuilt here, and there are two builds of shadow-utils in the sidetag, so one of them needs to be untagged before the sidetag can be submitted to Bodhi and merged.
I submitted a rebuild for singularity-ce [1] and untagged shadow-utils-4.20.0.rc3-1.fc45 in favor of shadow-utils-4.20.0-1.fc45.
-- Lokesh GitLab, GitHub, Fedora: lsm5 Matrix: @lsm5:matrix.org GPG: 9E33DD8704CC03E2DEB84D9A1C1EDD7CC7C3A0DD https://keybase.io/lsm5
On 8/3/26 3:06 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar via devel wrote:
Seems shadow-utils maintainers can't create the bodhi either.
I filed https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 .
I submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-06e3d92054. Some of the tests are failing so that needs to be looked into before the update can be merged.
All the best, Maxwell
On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 8:41 AM Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com mailto:lsm5@redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks all for handling this! I'm trying to submit a bodhi update (this time hopefully the right way), but it's not letting me, saying I don't have commit access to apptainer, shadow-utils and singularity-ce. Maybe only the sidetag owner (Iker / shadow-utils team) can create this? On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 5:39 PM Maxwell G <maxwell@gtmx.me <mailto:maxwell@gtmx.me>> wrote: On 7/31/26 4:34 PM, Maxwell G wrote: > It looks like singularity-ce still needs to be rebuilt here, and there > are two builds of shadow-utils in the sidetag, so one of them needs to > be untagged before the sidetag can be submitted to Bodhi and merged. I submitted a rebuild for singularity-ce [1] and untagged shadow-utils-4.20.0.rc3-1.fc45 in favor of shadow- utils-4.20.0-1.fc45. [1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo? taskID=148533045 <https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo? taskID=148533045> -- Lokesh GitLab, GitHub, Fedora: lsm5 Matrix: @lsm5:matrix.org <http://matrix.org> GPG: 9E33DD8704CC03E2DEB84D9A1C1EDD7CC7C3A0DD https://keybase.io/lsm5 <https://keybase.io/lsm5>-- Lokesh GitLab, GitHub, Fedora: lsm5 Matrix: @lsm5:matrix.org http://matrix.org GPG: 9E33DD8704CC03E2DEB84D9A1C1EDD7CC7C3A0DD https://keybase.io/lsm5 https://keybase.io/lsm5
On Mon, 2026-08-03 at 23:50 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
On 8/3/26 3:06 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar via devel wrote:
Seems shadow-utils maintainers can't create the bodhi either.
I filed https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 .
I submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-06e3d92054. Some of the tests are failing so that needs to be looked into before the update can be merged.
tier0 tests on buildah failed apparently because of a package conflict:
Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: package apptainer-1.5.3-6.fc45.x86_64 from @commandline conflicts with sif-runtime provided by singularity-ce-4.5.0-3.fc45.x86_64 from @commandline
this may be the known-problematic Fedora CI behavior where it always tries to install all packages from the update together, even if they explicitly conflict with each other. If so the failure can probably be waived.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 2:37 AM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, 2026-08-03 at 23:50 -0500, Maxwell G wrote:
On 8/3/26 3:06 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar via devel wrote:
Seems shadow-utils maintainers can't create the bodhi either.
I filed https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tickets/issues/13452 .
I submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-06e3d92054. Some of the tests are failing so that needs to be looked into before the update can be merged.
tier0 tests on buildah failed apparently because of a package conflict:
Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: package apptainer-1.5.3-6.fc45.x86_64 from @commandline conflicts with sif-runtime provided by singularity-ce-4.5.0-3.fc45.x86_64 from @commandline
Podman also failed the same way.
this may be the known-problematic Fedora CI behavior where it always tries to install all packages from the update together, even if they explicitly conflict with each other. If so the failure can probably be waived.
+1 to waiving.
-- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net
-
Adam Williamson -
Iker Pedrosa -
Lokesh Mandvekar -
Maxwell G