2:32 p.m.
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC), Daniel wrote:
Release of libxml2-2.7.8
libxml2.spec | 10 ++++++++--
Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
5:48 a.m.
New subject: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC), Daniel wrote:
> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
>
> libxml2.spec | 10 ++++++++--
Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
Dependent packages
should be rebuild.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
2:02 p.m.
New subject: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com>:
On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC), Daniel wrote:
>
>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
>>
>> libxml2.spec | 10 ++++++++--
> Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
Dependent packages should be rebuild.
There should have been a heads up for this. It affects 100s of packages.
Peter
2:16 p.m.
New subject: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8
Peter Robinson (pbrobinson(a)gmail.com) said:
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com>:
> On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC), Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
>>>
>>> libxml2.spec | 10 ++++++++--
>> Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
> Dependent packages should be rebuild.
There should have been a heads up for this. It affects 100s of packages.
It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
Bill
2:19 p.m.
New subject: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:16:32 -0400
Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobinson(a)gmail.com) said:
> 2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com>:
> > On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 +0000 (UTC), Daniel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
> >>>
> >>> libxml2.spec | 10 ++++++++--
> >> Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
> > Dependent packages should be rebuild.
>
> There should have been a heads up for this. It affects 100s of
> packages.
+ 1
It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
rebuilt?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org
2:57 p.m.
New subject: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:19:14 +0200
Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
rebuilt?
About 30min after the rawhide compose kicked off:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=203440
It's already fixed, but it didn't land in rawhide today.
So, I'm not sure what happens to packages that were rebuilt against the
broken one today. ;( They may need to rebuild again tomorrow...
kevin
3:05 p.m.
New subject: [libxml2] Release of libxml2-2.7.8
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 13:57:18 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:19:14 +0200
Jussi Lehtola <jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > It's being fixed; no rebuilds needed.
>
> Fixed, in what sense? What about the packages that have already been
> rebuilt?
About 30min after the rawhide compose kicked off:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=203440
It's already fixed, but it didn't land in rawhide today.
So, I'm not sure what happens to packages that were rebuilt against the
broken one today. ;( They may need to rebuild again tomorrow...
I guess I'm glad I'm a little slow to fix build errors. I was going to get to
doing a rebuild over the weekend, but now I don't need to.
4920
days inactive
4921
days old
6 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Bill Nottingham -
Bruno Wolff III -
Kevin Fenzi -
Marcela Mašláňová -
Michael Schwendt -
Peter Robinson -
Susi Lehtola