Firefox 49.0.2

[Bojan Smojver]

Could someone with access please build this version of FF. Apparently,
it's a security release.

Thanks,
-- 
Bojan

[Greg Evenden]

>  Could someone with access please build this version of FF.
> Apparently,
>  it's a security release.
>  
>  Thanks, 
usually Martin Stransky builds them, i think there is a JavaScript Bug
fixed https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/49.0.2/releasenotes/, but IMO there is no
point in compiling 49.0.2 when 50 will be out in about 2 weeks

[Bojan Smojver]

What about this?

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2016-87/

-- 
Bojan

[Bojan Smojver]

Which is also already in Bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387589

-- 
Bojan

[Florian Weimer]

On 10/26/2016 02:45 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>  What about this?
>
>  https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2016-87/ 
And it seems that Fedora builds do not enable e10s, so the cache leak 
might actually affect users.

Florian

[Greg Evenden]

>  On 10/26/2016 02:45 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>  
>  And it seems that Fedora builds do not enable e10s, so the cache leak 
>  might actually affect users.
>  
>  Florian 
i dont think e10s are actually stable enough for users to actually use, but
as i said above, i really dont think 49.0.2 warrants building  since 50 is gonna be
released on the 8th https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar

[Bojan Smojver]

I use e10 all the time. Works fine.

-- 
Bojan

[Martin Stransky]

Thanks for pointing it here, I miss that minor update. Btw. a new #BZ at 
bugzilla.redhat.com would work even better.

There are two security bugs marked as "High" which means "Moderate" in

Fedora terms. The big ones has "Critical" rating and there's none fixed 
in this release.

AFAIK the main reason for 49.0.(1|2) releases were:

- the async rendering (mozbz#1307108)
- the d3d9 fallback (mozbz#1309330)

which are not so important for Fedora so we're going to ship the 49.0.2 
release and ship 50.0.

ma.

On 10/25/2016 09:23 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>  Could someone with access please build this version of FF.
> Apparently,
>  it's a security release.
>
>  Thanks,
>

[Michael J Gruber]

Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 26.10.2016 11:42:
>  Thanks for pointing it here, I miss that minor update. Btw. a new #BZ
> at 
>  bugzilla.redhat.com would work even better.
>  
>  There are two security bugs marked as "High" which means "Moderate"
> in 
>  Fedora terms. The big ones has "Critical" rating and there's none fixed 
>  in this release.
>  
>  AFAIK the main reason for 49.0.(1|2) releases were:
>  
>  - the async rendering (mozbz#1307108)
>  - the d3d9 fallback (mozbz#1309330)
>  
>  which are not so important for Fedora so we're going to ship the 49.0.2 
>  release and ship 50.0. 
From the context, I guess that first "ship" is a a "skip", right?

>  ma.
>  
>  On 10/25/2016 09:23 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Could someone with access please build this version of FF. Apparently,
> > it's a security release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>

[Martin Stransky]

On 10/27/2016 11:11 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>  Martin Stransky venit, vidit, dixit 26.10.2016 11:42:
> > Thanks for pointing it here, I miss that minor update. Btw. a new #BZ at
> > bugzilla.redhat.com would work even better.
> >
> > There are two security bugs marked as "High" which means
> "Moderate" in
> > Fedora terms. The big ones has "Critical" rating and there's none
> fixed
> > in this release.
> >
> > AFAIK the main reason for 49.0.(1|2) releases were:
> >
> > - the async rendering (mozbz#1307108)
> > - the d3d9 fallback (mozbz#1309330)
> >
> > which are not so important for Fedora so we're going to ship the 49.0.2
> > release and ship 50.0.
>
>  From the context, I guess that first "ship" is a a "skip", right?
Yes, sorry for the misleading typo here :)
ma.

> > ma.
> >
> > On 10/25/2016 09:23 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> >> Could someone with access please build this version of FF. Apparently,
> >> it's a security release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>