4:59 a.m.
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is impractical
for me to check all of these software to see if any of them depends on
these command line utilities. If you have a package that depends on
libsndfile, it would be good to check whether it uses these utilities.
Then you'll need to require libsndfile-utils directly. If your package
just needs the library there is nothing to worry about. Again, the
utils split is only made in F-13.
Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
it has the libvorbis support enabled.
Cheers,
oget
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515172
12:19 p.m.
On 11/14/2009 05:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is impractical
for me to check all of these software to see if any of them depends on
these command line utilities. If you have a package that depends on
libsndfile, it would be good to check whether it uses these utilities.
Then you'll need to require libsndfile-utils directly. If your package
just needs the library there is nothing to worry about. Again, the
utils split is only made in F-13.
Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
it has the libvorbis support enabled.
Thanks for taking care of this.
~spot
1:38 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is impractical
for me to check all of these software to see if any of them depends on
these command line utilities. If you have a package that depends on
libsndfile, it would be good to check whether it uses these utilities.
Then you'll need to require libsndfile-utils directly. If your package
just needs the library there is nothing to worry about. Again, the
utils split is only made in F-13.
Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
it has the libvorbis support enabled.
Any chance of getting the jack-audio-connection-kit dependency split
out into a sub package?
Cheers,
Peter
2:15 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Hi folks,
> After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
> standing libsndfile bugs.
>
> One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
> libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
>
> Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is impractical
> for me to check all of these software to see if any of them depends on
> these command line utilities. If you have a package that depends on
> libsndfile, it would be good to check whether it uses these utilities.
> Then you'll need to require libsndfile-utils directly. If your package
> just needs the library there is nothing to worry about. Again, the
> utils split is only made in F-13.
>
> Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
> it has the libvorbis support enabled.
Any chance of getting the jack-audio-connection-kit dependency split
out into a sub package?
I think that the jack dependency comes from one of the command line
utilities of libsndfile which are now separated into the
libsndfile-tools package.
Note that here "now" means F-13+. I didn't want to make the split on
F-12 and before as it might break potential direct dependencies on
these utilities. This will give packagers a full release cycle to find
regressions if there are any. Or am I too paranoid?
Orcan
2:45 p.m.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
>> standing libsndfile bugs.
>>
>> One of these was a request [1] to split the utilities that come with
>> libsndfile into a utils subpackage. I did this only for F-13.
>>
>> Since libsndfile is used by so many other software, it is impractical
>> for me to check all of these software to see if any of them depends on
>> these command line utilities. If you have a package that depends on
>> libsndfile, it would be good to check whether it uses these utilities.
>> Then you'll need to require libsndfile-utils directly. If your package
>> just needs the library there is nothing to worry about. Again, the
>> utils split is only made in F-13.
>>
>> Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
>> it has the libvorbis support enabled.
>
> Any chance of getting the jack-audio-connection-kit dependency split
> out into a sub package?
>
I think that the jack dependency comes from one of the command line
utilities of libsndfile which are now separated into the
libsndfile-tools package.
Note that here "now" means F-13+. I didn't want to make the split on
F-12 and before as it might break potential direct dependencies on
these utilities. This will give packagers a full release cycle to find
regressions if there are any. Or am I too paranoid?
F-13+ is just fine.
Cheers,
Peter
2:46 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora(a)gmail.com> wrote:
After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
standing libsndfile bugs.
[...]
Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
it has the libvorbis support enabled.
Will libsndfile get updated in EPEL?
--
Jeff Ollie
8:45 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> After getting okays from a few folks I decided to fix the long
> standing libsndfile bugs.
>
> [...]
>
> Other than that, libsndfile is updated to 1.0.20 in F-10+. Also, now
> it has the libvorbis support enabled.
Will libsndfile get updated in EPEL?
Sorry, I don't have personal interest in EPEL. I don't even know if I
have commit access to EPEL packages with a Fedora proven packager
status. It should be straightforward for an EPEL packager to copy the
SPEC file and the source to make a build.
Orcan
5323
days inactive
5329
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Jeffrey Ollie -
Mat Booth -
Orcan Ogetbil -
Peter Robinson -
Tom Callaway