Package Reviews Statistics

[Michal Novotny]

Hello,

as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on this
first infrastructure ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748.

Basically, I updated an old script that collects stats on packages reviews
present on Bugzilla. I wonder if this information could actually be useful
(or at least interesting) to some people and if weekly automated updates
(as described in the ticket) are worth the effort :).

To find this out, I ran the script manually to show you what kind of
information it provides. There are two different kind of stats the script
can collect - completed and in-progress reviews.

1) below are completed reviews (fedora-review+) from the last week + the
reviewers that approved the package + links and the package names

Start Date: 2016-07-04 10:37:41.533674
End Date: 2016-07-11 10:37:41.533674

puntogil(a)libero.it : 4

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352667    licensecheck
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
perl-Pod-Constants
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331589    multibit-commons
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347987    pasystray


ignatenko(a)redhat.com : 3

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352993    python-args
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996    python-zipstream
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184    qhttpengine


tcallawa(a)redhat.com : 2

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317282    bspwm
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744    belle-sip


tom(a)compton.nu : 2

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526    nodejs-tracejs
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279127    nodejs-each


admiller(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308480    wlc


anto.trande(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278    mame


athmanem(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349575    python-multidict


jarodwilson(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029    libi40iw


jaruga(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351575
rubygem-mime-types-data


lkundrak(a)v3.sk : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876    clatd


loganjerry(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988    giac


lsm5(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533    bubblewrap


lupinix(a)mailbox.org : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353    libunity


manisandro(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346382    picketlink


msimacek(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353572    HikariCP


msuchy(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353469
python-marshmallow-enum


projects.rg(a)smart.ms : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321687    qpid-java


rdieter(a)math.unl.edu : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322    chromium


williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351097
python-uritemplate



Total reviews modified: 26
Merge Reviews: 0
Review Requests: 26
This report by generated by bzReviewReport.py.
The source is available at:
https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzReviewReport.py
Please submit patches or bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/


2) below are in-progress reviews (fedora-review?) from the last week + the
reviewers that flagged the review with "?" + links and the package names

start date: 2016-07-04 10:44:01.887148
end date: 2016-07-11 10:44:01.887148

ignatenko(a)redhat.com : 3

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202    purple-hangouts
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408    lasem
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323214    git-evtag


admiller(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561    sway


athmanem(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324667    python-locket


hegjon(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347973
aries-blueprint-api


mizdebsk(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917    gossip


projects.rg(a)smart.ms : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309794    qtscrob


williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972    python-twine


ybronhei(a)redhat.com : 1

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038    python-blivet1



total reviews modified: 10
merge reviews: 0
review requests: 10
this report by generated by bzreviewreport.py.
the source is available at:
https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzreviewreport.py
please submihttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202t patches or
bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/

---

Would you be interested in getting some of this info (part1, part2 or both
parts) regularly?

Thank you for any feedback!
clime

[Antonio Trande]

On 07/11/2016 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>  Hello,
>  
>  as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on
>  this first infrastructure ticket
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748.
>  
>  Basically, I updated an old script that collects stats on packages
>  reviews present on Bugzilla. I wonder if this information could actually
>  be useful (or at least interesting) to some people and if weekly
>  automated updates (as described in the ticket) are worth the effort :).
>  
>  To find this out, I ran the script manually to show you what kind of
>  information it provides. There are two different kind of stats the
>  script can collect - completed and in-progress reviews.
>  
>  ...
>  ---
>  
>  Would you be interested in getting some of this info (part1, part2 or
>  both parts) regularly?
>  
>  Thank you for any feedback!
>  clime
>   
Interesting. Could be useful get all stalled reviews and since how many
time they are.

-- 
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/

[Igor Gnatenko]

For me would be better some page with stats/links to weekly status,
monthly status, yearly status and some nice graphics ;)

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny <clime(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hello,
>
>  as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on this
>  first infrastructure ticket
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748.
>
>  Basically, I updated an old script that collects stats on packages reviews
>  present on Bugzilla. I wonder if this information could actually be useful
>  (or at least interesting) to some people and if weekly automated updates (as
>  described in the ticket) are worth the effort :).
>
>  To find this out, I ran the script manually to show you what kind of
>  information it provides. There are two different kind of stats the script
>  can collect - completed and in-progress reviews.
>
>  1) below are completed reviews (fedora-review+) from the last week + the
>  reviewers that approved the package + links and the package names
>
>  Start Date: 2016-07-04 10:37:41.533674
>  End Date: 2016-07-11 10:37:41.533674
>
>  puntogil(a)libero.it : 4
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352667    licensecheck
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
>  perl-Pod-Constants
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331589    multibit-commons
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347987    pasystray
>
>
>  ignatenko(a)redhat.com : 3
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352993    python-args
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996    python-zipstream
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184    qhttpengine
>
>
>  tcallawa(a)redhat.com : 2
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317282    bspwm
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744    belle-sip
>
>
>  tom(a)compton.nu : 2
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526    nodejs-tracejs
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279127    nodejs-each
>
>
>  admiller(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308480    wlc
>
>
>  anto.trande(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278    mame
>
>
>  athmanem(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349575    python-multidict
>
>
>  jarodwilson(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029    libi40iw
>
>
>  jaruga(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351575
>  rubygem-mime-types-data
>
>
>  lkundrak(a)v3.sk : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876    clatd
>
>
>  loganjerry(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988    giac
>
>
>  lsm5(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533    bubblewrap
>
>
>  lupinix(a)mailbox.org : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353    libunity
>
>
>  manisandro(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346382    picketlink
>
>
>  msimacek(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353572    HikariCP
>
>
>  msuchy(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353469
>  python-marshmallow-enum
>
>
>  projects.rg(a)smart.ms : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321687    qpid-java
>
>
>  rdieter(a)math.unl.edu : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322    chromium
>
>
>  williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351097
>  python-uritemplate
>
>
>
>  Total reviews modified: 26
>  Merge Reviews: 0
>  Review Requests: 26
>  This report by generated by bzReviewReport.py.
>  The source is available at:
>  https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzReviewReport.py
>  Please submit patches or bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/
>
>
>  2) below are in-progress reviews (fedora-review?) from the last week + the
>  reviewers that flagged the review with "?" + links and the package names
>
>  start date: 2016-07-04 10:44:01.887148
>  end date: 2016-07-11 10:44:01.887148
>
>  ignatenko(a)redhat.com : 3
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202    purple-hangouts
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408    lasem
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323214    git-evtag
>
>
>  admiller(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561    sway
>
>
>  athmanem(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324667    python-locket
>
>
>  hegjon(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347973
>  aries-blueprint-api
>
>
>  mizdebsk(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917    gossip
>
>
>  projects.rg(a)smart.ms : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309794    qtscrob
>
>
>  williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972    python-twine
>
>
>  ybronhei(a)redhat.com : 1
>
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038    python-blivet1
>
>
>
>  total reviews modified: 10
>  merge reviews: 0
>  review requests: 10
>  this report by generated by bzreviewreport.py.
>  the source is available at:
>  https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzreviewreport.py
>  please submihttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202t patches or
>  bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/
>
>  ---
>
>  Would you be interested in getting some of this info (part1, part2 or both
>  parts) regularly?
>
>  Thank you for any feedback!
>  clime
>
>
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>  


-- 
-Igor Gnatenko

[Parag Nemade]

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  For me would be better some page with stats/links to weekly status,
>  monthly status, yearly status and some nice graphics ;)
>
>  On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Michal Novotny <clime(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as a new Fedora Infrastructure apprentice, I am currently working on this
> > first infrastructure ticket
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3748.
> >
> > Basically, I updated an old script that collects stats on packages reviews
> > present on Bugzilla. I wonder if this information could actually be useful
> > (or at least interesting) to some people and if weekly automated updates (as
> > described in the ticket) are worth the effort :).
> >
> > To find this out, I ran the script manually to show you what kind of
> > information it provides. There are two different kind of stats the script
> > can collect - completed and in-progress reviews.
> >
> > 1) below are completed reviews (fedora-review+) from the last week + the
> > reviewers that approved the package + links and the package names
> >
> > Start Date: 2016-07-04 10:37:41.533674
> > End Date: 2016-07-11 10:37:41.533674
> >
> > puntogil(a)libero.it : 4
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352667    licensecheck
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
> > perl-Pod-Constants
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331589    multibit-commons
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347987    pasystray
> >
> >
> > ignatenko(a)redhat.com : 3
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352993    python-args
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352996    python-zipstream
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354184    qhttpengine
> >
> >
> > tcallawa(a)redhat.com : 2
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317282    bspwm
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744    belle-sip
> >
> >
> > tom(a)compton.nu : 2
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273526    nodejs-tracejs
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279127    nodejs-each
> >
> >
> > admiller(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308480    wlc
> >
> >
> > anto.trande(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278    mame
> >
> >
> > athmanem(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349575    python-multidict
> >
> >
> > jarodwilson(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350029    libi40iw
> >
> >
> > jaruga(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351575
> > rubygem-mime-types-data
> >
> >
> > lkundrak(a)v3.sk : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302876    clatd
> >
> >
> > loganjerry(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988    giac
> >
> >
> > lsm5(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333533    bubblewrap
> >
> >
> > lupinix(a)mailbox.org : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353    libunity
> >
> >
> > manisandro(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346382    picketlink
> >
> >
> > msimacek(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353572    HikariCP
> >
> >
> > msuchy(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353469
> > python-marshmallow-enum
> >
> >
> > projects.rg(a)smart.ms : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321687    qpid-java
> >
> >
> > rdieter(a)math.unl.edu : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322    chromium
> >
> >
> > williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351097
> > python-uritemplate
> >
> >
> >
> > Total reviews modified: 26
> > Merge Reviews: 0
> > Review Requests: 26
> > This report by generated by bzReviewReport.py.
> > The source is available at:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzReviewReport.py
> > Please submit patches or bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/
> >
> >
> > 2) below are in-progress reviews (fedora-review?) from the last week + the
> > reviewers that flagged the review with "?" + links and the package names
> >
> > start date: 2016-07-04 10:44:01.887148
> > end date: 2016-07-11 10:44:01.887148
> >
> > ignatenko(a)redhat.com : 3
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202    purple-hangouts
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352408    lasem
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323214    git-evtag
> >
> >
> > admiller(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308561    sway
> >
> >
> > athmanem(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324667    python-locket
> >
> >
> > hegjon(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347973
> > aries-blueprint-api
> >
> >
> > mizdebsk(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353917    gossip
> >
> >
> > projects.rg(a)smart.ms : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309794    qtscrob
> >
> >
> > williamjmorenor(a)gmail.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352972    python-twine
> >
> >
> > ybronhei(a)redhat.com : 1
> >
> >     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038    python-blivet1
> >
> >
> >
> > total reviews modified: 10
> > merge reviews: 0
> > review requests: 10
> > this report by generated by bzreviewreport.py.
> > the source is available at:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/triage/browser/scripts/bzreviewreport.py
> > please submihttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354202t patches or
> > bug reports at: https://fedorahosted.org/triage/
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Would you be interested in getting some of this info (part1, part2 or both
> > parts) regularly?
> >
> > Thank you for any feedback!
> > clime
> > 
After long time I see this script results on devel list. Last few
maintainers have tried to update this script but I think whenever
bugzilla gets updated this script got broken.
But I really don't see any need to send these weekly results on devel
list. How about integrating these results in
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus ?

Regards,
Parag.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:28:01 +0530
Parag Nemade <panemade(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  After long time I see this script results on devel list. Last few
>  maintainers have tried to update this script but I think whenever
>  bugzilla gets updated this script got broken.
>  But I really don't see any need to send these weekly results on devel
>  list. How about integrating these results in
>  https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus ? 
We could do that, but then someone has to actively go look. 

My understanding when this script was last proposed is that it would
allow people to see what happened in the last week with reviews, and
would perhaps drive people to go do some more. 

If no one wants another weekly email with this we can drop it... 

kevin

[Raphael Groner]

Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to implement
badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the badges team.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101

[Igor Gnatenko]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner
<raphgro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open
> issue to implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the badges
> team.
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101 
whoa! would be happy to get some number of badges for this ;)
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail] 


-- 
-Igor Gnatenko

[Parag Nemade]

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner
>  <raphgro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
> > Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue to
> implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the badges team.
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101
>
>  whoa! would be happy to get some number of badges for this ;) 
But this will not be a perfect thing. sometimes people make mistakes
and reset the flags so there are chances for other people to set the
fedora-review+ flag back and get the +1 fedmsg count as package
reviewed.

Regards,
Parag.

[Michal Novotny]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Parag Nemade <panemade(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>  On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  wrote:
>  > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner
>  > <raphgro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  >> Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open issue
>  to implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with
>  the badges team.
>  >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101
>  >
>  > whoa! would be happy to get some number of badges for this ;)
>
>  But this will not be a perfect thing. sometimes people make mistakes
>  and reset the flags so there are chances for other people to set the
>  fedora-review+ flag back and get the +1 fedmsg count as package
>  reviewed.
>  
If this is really a problem, I can fix it :).

clime

[Michal Novotny]

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Raphael Groner <raphgro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
wrote:

>  Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open
> issue to
>  implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in contact with the
>  badges team.
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101 


This is a nice idea. I'll ask them about this.

Thanks!
clime

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:18:25 -0000
"Raphael Groner" <raphgro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:

>  Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old
> open
>  issue to implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in
>  contact with the badges team.
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101  
Yep. It could, but again badges will only be there if someone goes
seeking them out. A weekly status email would be much more visible to
folks on this list. 

kevin

[Michal Novotny]

The truth is that the script for the review awards will need to be written
almost from a scratch and it seems to be a longer shot from where we are
now. As a lazy programmer, I need to cheer for the stats being sent to the
list :).

clime

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:18:25 -0000
>  "Raphael Groner" <raphgro(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>
>  > Can that information be used to award badges? There's an old open
>  > issue to implement badges for doing package reviews. Maybe get in
>  > contact with the badges team.
>  > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-badges/ticket/101
>
>  Yep. It could, but again badges will only be there if someone goes
>  seeking them out. A weekly status email would be much more visible to
>  folks on this list.
>
>  kevin
>
>
>
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>
>