release version numbers

[Paul Heinlein]

I'd like to submit a patch to Mark Burgess so that cfengine can
correctly parse Fedora's /etc/redhat-release file. I'm wondering if
there's an official roadmap for version numbers. Currently, it's 0.94,
so I assume that the first release will be 1.00. Or will it be 1.0? Or
1.0.0? And how will the numbers progress?

seq 1    seq 2   seq 3
  -------  ------  -----
  1.00     1.0     1.0.0
  1.10     1.1     1.1.0
  1.15     1.1p5   1.1.5
  2.00     2.0     2.0.0

Or will there be a sequence altogether?

Thanks!

--Paul Heinlein

[Bill Nottingham]

Paul Heinlein ([e-mail]) said:
> I'd like to submit a patch to Mark Burgess so that cfengine can
> correctly parse Fedora's /etc/redhat-release file. I'm wondering if
> there's an official roadmap for version numbers. Currently, it's 0.94,
> so I assume that the first release will be 1.00. Or will it be 1.0? Or
> 1.0.0? And how will the numbers progress?

Current plan is:

1
2
3
4

etc.

Bill

[Paul Heinlein]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Current plan is:
>
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4

Excellent! Thanks for the heads-up.

--Paul Heinlein

[Andrew Sobala]

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 00:08, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Current plan is:
> >
> > 1
> > 2
> > 3
> > 4
>
> Excellent! Thanks for the heads-up.
>
> --Paul Heinlein

(Presumably "1.94", "2.94" etc. may exist for betas?)

[Bill Nottingham]

Andrew Sobala ([e-mail]) said:
> (Presumably "1.94", "2.94" etc. may exist for betas?)

Yeah, something like that for prereleases.

Bill

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Sep 29, 2003, Bill Nottingham  wrote:
> Andrew Sobala ([e-mail]) said:
> > (Presumably "1.94", "2.94" etc. may exist for betas?)
> Yeah, something like that for prereleases.

I'm sure you mean test releases :-)