Re: rpms/empathy/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 empathy.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7

[Brian Pepple]

On 10/2/07, pgordon Peter Gordon <fedora-extras-commits(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  @@ -163,7 +163,9 @@
>   %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/GNOME_Megaphone_Applet.schemas
>   %{_bindir}/empathy
>   %{_bindir}/empathy-accounts
>  +%{_bindir}/empathy-call-chandler
>   %{_datadir}/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.Empathy.Chat.service
>  +%{_datadir}/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.Empathy.Call.service
>   %{_datadir}/empathy/
>   %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop
>   %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/%{name}* 
Ummm, haven't we been in feature freeze for a bit?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/Schedule
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FeatureFreezePolicy

rpms/empathy/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 empathy.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7

[Kevin Kofler]

Brian Pepple <bpepple <at> fedoraproject.org> writes:
>  Ummm, haven't we been in feature freeze for a bit? 
Let's be realistic, what is an extra D-Bus service going to break? Especially 
in an application like Empathy which isn't even a default app (Pidgin is).

        Kevin Kofler

rpms/empathy/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 empathy.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7

[Peter Gordon]

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 19:29 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
>  Ummm, haven't we been in feature freeze for a bit?
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/Schedule
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FeatureFreezePolicy 
Hmm. I didn't think this feature was significant enough that it would
break the freeze (since Empathy isn't an "essential" or default
package); but if I can disable it if that would be preferred. (It's
theoretically just an additional "--disable-voip" option to the
configure script.) 

My thinking on it is (as Kevin pointed out in an earlier reply) that
it's an additional feature that does not alter anything already
in-place. Also, if I disabled it now it would probably end up being
re-enabled after GA, so enabling it now means that we get that extra bit
of testing from Rawhide users.

If needed, I can happily push a new build with the VoIP stuff disabled.

Thanks; and sorry for the slight confusion.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

rpms/empathy/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 empathy.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7

[Brian Pepple]

On 10/2/07, Peter Gordon <peter(a)thecodergeek.com&gt; wrote:
>  My thinking on it is (as Kevin pointed out in an earlier reply) that
>  it's an additional feature that does not alter anything already
>  in-place. Also, if I disabled it now it would probably end up being
>  re-enabled after GA, so enabling it now means that we get that extra bit
>  of testing from Rawhide users.
>
>  If needed, I can happily push a new build with the VoIP stuff disabled. 
I would lean toward disabling the voip stuff, since Xavier has said it
isn't stable yet, and by default it is disabled.

rpms/empathy/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 empathy.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.6, 1.7

[Peter Gordon]

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 22:14 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote:
>  I would lean toward disabling the voip stuff, since Xavier has said
> it
>  isn't stable yet, and by default it is disabled. 
That sounds reasonable. I apologize for the slight mishap, and thanks
for pointing out my mistake. :) 

I'll push a build momentarily with the VoIP stuff disabled.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479