On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:01:00AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:36:48AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
> I have been trying to contact packagers without a proper bugzilla account
> associated with their FAS email for a while now. The first email to devel-announce
> is from June 13th .
> This is a requirement for packagers which is mentioned at:
> Since then a number of packagers have fixed their situation but that user did not.
> Currently I see:
> amitshah is maintaining rpms/pius
> amitshah is maintaining rpms/qemu
> I am hereby starting the non-responsive procedure for that user.
> Does someone know how to contact them?
> Failing to contact them, I will be asking FESCo to orphan the packages.
I hope you are taking into account co-maintainers here, as there is
absolutely no reason to ask for 'qemu' to be orphaned when there are
nine other co-maintainers.
I now realized the wording is confusing/incorrect. I guess a better wording
should have been:
Failing to contact them, I'll be asking FESCo to remove the account from the
package (potentially orphaning it if the account is the main maintainer)
Does this make more sense?
I've removed Amit from the qemu package since he's not made
there in circa 10 years AFAICS.
Thanks for that :)