Re: Please provide "Minimal CD" of Fedora

[Samuel Rakitničan]

Quite frankly, I don't think Fedora is suitable for people with low
bandwidth, simply because of its nature of updating policy. Even when using
proxy with squid cache for packages, packages updates constantly and cache
becomes obsolete very quickly. CentOS is much better choice.

Please provide "Minimal CD" of Fedora

[Utkarsh Anand]

And build your own kernel and compile other applications from source?
Wouldn't that fragment the system? That might lead to dependency issues!
CentOS is only good enough if he doesn't want the latest and greatest of
everything! Or if he runs on old hardware.

On Feb 20, 2017 17:21, "Samuel Rakitničan" <samuel.rakitnican(a)gmail.com&gt;
wrote:

>  Quite frankly, I don't think Fedora is suitable for people with
> low
>  bandwidth, simply because of its nature of updating policy. Even when using
>  proxy with squid cache for packages, packages updates constantly and cache
>  becomes obsolete very quickly. CentOS is much better choice.
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>

Please provide "Minimal CD" of Fedora

[Samuel Rakitničan]

>  And build your own kernel and compile other applications from
> source?
>  Wouldn't that fragment the system? That might lead to dependency issues!
>  CentOS is only good enough if he doesn't want the latest and greatest of
>  everything! Or if he runs on old hardware.
>   
Almost all is available for CentOS also including latest kernels from third party repoes.
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml