sqlite and sqlite-devel broken dependencies in F23

[Reartes Guillermo]

Hi,

today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
dependencies as reported by dnf.

Reported at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014

Cheers.

~~~~

[...TRUNCATED...]
 qca                                                   x86_64
                2.1.1-4.fc23                              updates
                    454 k
 qca-qt5                                               x86_64
                2.1.1-4.fc23                              updates
                    454 k
 qca-qt5-ossl                                          x86_64
                2.1.1-4.fc23                              updates
                    105 k
Saltando paquetes con dependencias rotas.:
 sqlite                                                x86_64
                3.11.0-1.fc23                             updates
                    484 k
 sqlite-devel                                          x86_64
                3.11.0-1.fc23                             updates
                    129 k

Resumen de la transacción
========================================================================================================================================================================
Instalar     1 Package
Actualizar  22 Packages
Skip         2 Packages
[...TRUNCATED...]

[Rex Dieter]

Reartes Guillermo wrote:

>  Hi,
>  
>  today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
>  dependencies as reported by dnf.
>  
>  Reported at:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014 
Known, yes, see:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-850f410498

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 08:31 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  Reartes Guillermo wrote:
>  
>  > 
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > today i noticed that sqlite and sqlite-devel have both broken
>  > dependencies as reported by dnf.
>  > 
>  > Reported at:
>  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312014 
>  Known, yes, see:
>  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-850f410498 
For the record, this got +3 karma very quickly and was auto-submitted
for stable, however, there wasn't a stable push for three days. In the
meantime a lot of negative karma came in, but there's apparently still
no kind of rule about cancelling a pending autopush request if the
karma drops back below the threshold, so it still got pushed even
though, by the time the push happened, its karma was -2 or -3.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

[Gerald B. Cox]

Just out of curiosity... Shouldn't this have been caught by mock build,
rpmlint?

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:50 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>  Just out of curiosity... Shouldn't this have been caught by mock
> build,
>  rpmlint? 
rpmlint doesn't tell you anything about dependencies. Ideally a
taskotron test should have caught this, but none of the current tests
happens to catch this particular error.

The maintainer was trying to do a slightly complex operation and I
don't think they quite grokked the proper way to do it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net