On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 15:57 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
I noticed that "dhcpv6 license correction" is a correction
noting that
dhcpv6 was labeled as GPL but it is really BSD.
Is it really necessary to advertise a license change from more
restrictive to less restrictive license?
GPL -> BSD will never cause a new conflict right?
If I had a patch that copied GPL code into it, then yes I'd like to be
notified of it no longer being gpl, since that does have implications...
(fwiw I dont have such a patch)