Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

[Pavel Alexeev]

Hello.

I try build new version of perdition package.

It build fine 
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on all 
architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got 
(https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log):

error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.2Sm2W5
/usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo

Could someone please help me solve that problem?

[Mark Wielaard]

On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I try build new version of perdition package.
>
> It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416)
> on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log):
>
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.2Sm2W5
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
>
> Could someone please help me solve that problem?

It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed.
But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files.
I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the end
of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file that hints
at where it is coming from.

It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
to track down what is going on.

Cheers,

Mark

[Dan Horák]

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
Mark Wielaard  wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I try build new version of perdition package.
> >
> > It build fine
> > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on
> > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log):
> >
> > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> >
> > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
>
> It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed.
> But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files.
> I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the
> end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> that hints at where it is coming from.
>
> It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> to track down what is going on.

so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest

Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.

Dan

[Pavel Alexeev]

On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
> Mark Wielaard  wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I try build new version of perdition package.
> > >
> > > It build fine
> > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on
> > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log):
> > >
> > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > > 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> > >
> > > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
> >
> > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed.
> > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files.
> > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the
> > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> > that hints at where it is coming from.
> >
> > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> > to track down what is going on.
>
> so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
>
> Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.

Sorry, is there any progress? Should I fill bug for that? Against what 
component?
> Dan
>
> devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...

[Mark Wielaard]

On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
> > Mark Wielaard  wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > I try build new version of perdition package.
> > > >
> > > > It build fine
> > > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416)
> > > > on
> > > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b
> > > > uild.log):
> > > >
> > > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > > > 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> > > >
> > > > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
> > >
> > > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> > > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
> > > crashed.
> > > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> > > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
> > > files.
> > > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
> > > the
> > > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> > > that hints at where it is coming from.
> > >
> > > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> > > to track down what is going on.
> >
> > so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
> >
> > Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
>
> Sorry, is there any progress?

Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
for some reason. See attached.

Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
replicate the issue.

Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:

ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
  if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
                                   ^~
ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
   if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
                                          ^~
make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1
> Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?

It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
_find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
because of the above error.

Cheers,

Mark

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 27.7.2018 v 00:31 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
> > > Mark Wielaard  wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > > > > Hello.
> > > > >
> > > > > I try build new version of perdition package.
> > > > >
> > > > > It build fine
> > > > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416)
> > > > > on
> > > > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > > > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b
> > > > > uild.log):
> > > > >
> > > > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
> > > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
> > > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
> > > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
> > > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
> > > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > > > > 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
> > > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> > > > >
> > > > > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
> > > >
> > > > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> > > > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
> > > > crashed.
> > > > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> > > > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
> > > > files.
> > > > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
> > > > the
> > > > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> > > > that hints at where it is coming from.
> > > >
> > > > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> > > > to track down what is going on.
> > >
> > > so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
> > >
> > > Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
> >
> > Sorry, is there any progress?
>
> Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
> for some reason. See attached.
>
> Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
> to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
> replicate the issue.
>
> Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:
>
> ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
> ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
>   if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
>                                    ^~
> ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
> ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
>    if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
>                                           ^~
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1

Please note that OpenSSL 1.1.1 landed in Rawhide a few days ago. That
could explain this errors ...

V.
> > Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?
>
> It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
> I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
> _find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
> because of the above error.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
> devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...

[Josef Ridky]

Hi folks,

I have found this error even during netpbm build [1].
Do we have any progress with it? I couldn't found anything related to dwz crash in build log. (Maybe I just overlooked it).

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6251/31036251/build.log

Regards

Josef Ridky
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Vít Ondruch" 
| To: [e-mail]
| Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 10:07:08 AM
| Subject: Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Dne 27.7.2018 v 00:31 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
| 
| 
| 
| On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
| Mark Wielaard  wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
| 
| 
| 
| Hello.
| 
| I try build new version of perdition package.
| 
| It build fine
| ( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416 )
| on
| all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
| ( https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b uild.log):
| 
| error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
| 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
| 
| Could someone please help me solve that problem?
| It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
| Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
| crashed.
| But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
| find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
| files.
| I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
| the
| end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
| that hints at where it is coming from.
| 
| It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
| to track down what is going on.
| so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
| 
| Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
| Sorry, is there any progress?
| Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
| for some reason. See attached.
| 
| Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
| to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
| replicate the issue.
| 
| Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:
| 
| ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
| ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
| 'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
|   if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
|                                    ^~
| ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
| ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
| 'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
|    if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
|                                           ^~
| make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1
| 
| Please note that OpenSSL 1.1.1 landed in Rawhide a few days ago. That could
| explain this errors ...
| 
| V.
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?
| It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
| I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
| _find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
| because of the above error.
| 
| Cheers,
| 
| Mark
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| devel mailing list -- [e-mail] To unsubscribe send an
| email to [e-mail] Fedora Code of Conduct:
| https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:
| https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:
| https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
| To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
| Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
| List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
| List Archives:
| https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
|

[Pavel Alexeev]

Hello

On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
> Mark Wielaard  wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I try build new version of perdition package.
> > >
> > > It build fine
> > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on
> > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log):
> > >
> > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > > 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> > >
> > > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
> >
> > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed.
> > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files.
> > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the
> > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> > that hints at where it is coming from.
> >
> > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> > to track down what is going on.
>
> so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
>
> Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.

Sorry, but is there some test machine with s390x or armv7vhl and 
rawhide? I cant find such on 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainer... 
and that issue cannot be reproduced in stable Fedora releases.
> Dan
>
> devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...