-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
- -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
_______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
Well, I think what prevents notify-python from being rebuilt against notify-python is in pygtk2 side (see bug 618944 I have filed), the workaround exists. Should the workaround be applied for now?
Regards, Mamoru
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:30 PM +9:00:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
Well, I think what prevents notify-python from being rebuilt against notify-python is in pygtk2 side (see bug 618944 I have filed), the workaround exists. Should the workaround be applied for now?
Oops, I meant "from being rebuilt againt python 2.7".
Mamoru
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
Well, I think what prevents notify-python from being rebuilt against notify-python is in pygtk2 side (see bug 618944 I have filed), the workaround exists. Should the workaround be applied for now?
I vote +1.
This package is vital. We need to get things going.
Orcan
Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:36 PM +9:00:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
Well, I think what prevents notify-python from being rebuilt against notify-python is in pygtk2 side (see bug 618944 I have filed), the workaround exists. Should the workaround be applied for now?
I vote +1.
This package is vital. We need to get things going.
Orcan
Well, workaround added in notify-python-0.1.1-13.fc1{4,5}. For F-14 I submitted push request.
Mamoru
On 07/30/2010 09:03 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Well, workaround added in notify-python-0.1.1-13.fc1{4,5}. For F-14 I submitted push request.
Thank you. FWIW I tried to fix this yesterday but I couldn't work in CVS because it was locked and I couldn't switch to the new git system, a chicken-n-egg problem. Plus some of us have things to do besides immediately respond to a massive change in the build system :-)
But anyway, thank you very much for making the fix.
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 22:03 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
I vote +1.
This package is vital. We need to get things going.
Orcan
Well, workaround added in notify-python-0.1.1-13.fc1{4,5}. For F-14 I submitted push request.
There's also a fixed pygtk2 awaiting review:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc14
I'm currently setting up a VM with current F14 and py27 (my desktop just has too many currently-broken-with-py27 packages installed for it to be feasible to update to py27 yet) to test these and I'll get feedback up as soon as I can. notify-python isn't critpath so it can be pushed whenever Mamoru feels like it, but pygtk2 is critpath so it will need positive feedback from someone else in addition to me for it to be pushed, so if someone could test it and provide feedback that would be great.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:30:52PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
Well, I think what prevents notify-python from being rebuilt against notify-python is in pygtk2 side (see bug 618944 I have filed), the workaround exists. Should the workaround be applied for now?
I put an extremely grotty patch into this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2358551
Rich.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:43:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I put an extremely grotty patch into this scratch build:
erm, which failed ...
Rich.
On Friday, July 30, 2010 07:22:45 am Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I can't check in stuff).
It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:
$ sudo yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude="*.i686" install fedora-packager [...] Error: Package: notify-python-0.1.1-8.fc12.x86_64 (fedora) Requires: python(abi) = 2.6 Removing: python-2.6.5-2.fc14.x86_64 (@koji/12) Available: compat-python24-2.4.6-1.fc13.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) Available: python-2.6.4-20.fc13.x86_64 (fedora) Installing: python-2.7-7.fc14.x86_64 (koji) Available: python3-3.1.2-6.fc13.x86_64 (updates-testing) Available: python3-3.1.2-12.fc14.x86_64 (koji)
Rich.
grab the fedora 13 build from koji and use it. its what i had to do siince i cant yet update to python 2.7 without removing lots of stuff i use
Dennis
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
We didn't have this *freeze* reflected in the Fedora 14 schedule. Is this the same as the task "Branch Fedora 14 from Rawhide?"
In "normal" circumstances, how long would you expect the freeze to last?
John
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:00:43AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
We didn't have this *freeze* reflected in the Fedora 14 schedule. Is this the same as the task "Branch Fedora 14 from Rawhide?"
Yes.
In "normal" circumstances, how long would you expect the freeze to last?
Jesse should confirm this, but my impression is that it won't be a freeze in the future -- we'll be able to branch both pkgdb and git without locking the repository down.
That said, I don't know if we have a human race condition where we branch a package and the maintainer builds for devel; unaware that it has already branched for F-14. So maybe we want a freeze anyway...
Jesse?
-Toshio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
We didn't have this *freeze* reflected in the Fedora 14 schedule. Is this the same as the task "Branch Fedora 14 from Rawhide?"
In "normal" circumstances, how long would you expect the freeze to last?
John
Well perhaps the page name is misleading, but this is the "freeze" of being branched and using bodhi for everything. It's exactly what we did last release, the first release of no frozen rawhide. We are "frozen" in that if you do a build in the f14 branch, the build won't automatically show up, you have to do a bodhi action.
- -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way through the boost/python havoc.
darrell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 10:24 AM, darrell pfeifer wrote:
Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way through the boost/python havoc.
er... they never went away... What are you seeing?
- -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way through the boost/python havoc.
darrell
static repos have long been deprecated koji creates a latest link each time a newRepo task finishes http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/dist-rawhide/latest/x86_64/ for instance
Dennis
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45, Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through
it
as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way through the boost/python havoc.
darrell
static repos have long been deprecated koji creates a latest link each time a newRepo task finishes http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/dist-rawhide/latest/x86_64/ for instance
I had been pointing to
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/for the longest time. I'll update it.
thanks.
darrell
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:45, Dennis Gilmore dennis@ausil.us wrote:
On Friday, July 30, 2010 12:24:06 pm darrell pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:00, Jesse Keating jkeating@redhat.com
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through
it
as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
Are the koji static repos coming back soon? Current rawhide is mid-way through the boost/python havoc.
darrell
static repos have long been deprecated koji creates a latest link each time a newRepo task finishes http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/dist-rawhide/latest/x86_64/ for instance
This looks like it hasn't been updated since 06:38 this morning (so newrepo
isn't running?)
darrell
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/30/2010 10:00 AM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branch_Freeze_Policy
I know it's been a rough couple of days here, python-2.7 and boost rebuilds creating build havoc, systemd creating some interesting confusion, and dist-git to top it all off. But we'll work through it as best as we can, as we always do. Onward into the future!
We didn't have this *freeze* reflected in the Fedora 14 schedule. Is this the same as the task "Branch Fedora 14 from Rawhide?"
In "normal" circumstances, how long would you expect the freeze to last?
John
Well perhaps the page name is misleading, but this is the "freeze" of being branched and using bodhi for everything. It's exactly what we did last release, the first release of no frozen rawhide. We are "frozen" in that if you do a build in the f14 branch, the build won't automatically show up, you have to do a bodhi action.
Okay. I was going off an earlier conversation that I'd understood to be "we have no more 'freezes,' period, in Fedora."
John
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 3:05 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
Okay. I was going off an earlier conversation that I'd understood to be "we have no more 'freezes,' period, in Fedora."
I'm open to naming this page something differently, since it's not a complete freeze.
- -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-
Adam Williamson -
darrell pfeifer -
Dennis Gilmore -
Jesse Keating -
Jesse Keating -
John Dennis -
John Poelstra -
Mamoru Tasaka -
Orcan Ogetbil -
Richard W.M. Jones -
Toshio Kuratomi