Should I be able to hibernate a NFS/LDAP using system?

[Orion Poplawski]

Before I start filing bugs (and to help determine where if needed), is 
it reasonable for me to expect to be able to put a desktop machine that 
uses LDAP authentication and NFS home directories into hibernate? 
Currently it seems to get hung up trying to do some work that attempts 
to query the LDAP server and syncing the filesystems (which seems to 
need NFS up) after NM has brought down the network interface.

Thoughts?

-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: [phone]
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

[Alexander Boström]

Orion Poplawski skrev:
>  Before I start filing bugs (and to help determine where if needed),
> is 
>  it reasonable for me to expect to be able to put a desktop machine that 
>  uses LDAP authentication and NFS home directories into hibernate? 
>  Currently it seems to get hung up trying to do some work that attempts 
>  to query the LDAP server and syncing the filesystems (which seems to 
>  need NFS up) after NM has brought down the network interface. 
You could perhaps use nscd to cache LDAP data, but for NFS you probably 
need to keep the network up through the suspend.

/abo

[Roberto Ragusa]

Orion Poplawski wrote:
>  Before I start filing bugs (and to help determine where if needed),
> is
>  it reasonable for me to expect to be able to put a desktop machine that
>  uses LDAP authentication and NFS home directories into hibernate?
>  Currently it seems to get hung up trying to do some work that attempts
>  to query the LDAP server and syncing the filesystems (which seems to
>  need NFS up) after NM has brought down the network interface.
>  
>  Thoughts? 
Why is NM bringing down the interface before hibernation?
I see no reason and would call that a bug.

-- 
   Roberto Ragusa    mail at robertoragusa.it