kernel-2.6.22.3-61.fc7

[Bojan Smojver]

Could we have the above in the F7 testing? Or is there a reason for
keeping a kernel based on 2.6.22.2 in there?

-- 
Bojan

[Christopher Brown]

On 21/08/07, Bojan Smojver <bojan(a)rexursive.com&gt; wrote:
>  Could we have the above in the F7 testing? Or is there a reason for
>  keeping a kernel based on 2.6.22.2 in there? 

There is a fedora kernel mailing list which you might like to try asking on.
To hazard a guess I would say that by the time each kernel has gone through
updates-testing then a new release has been made - note that today
2.6.22.4is out, thereby nullifying the point of keeping each version
in
updates-testing for the necessary period. If a flaw is severe enough to
warrant an update then I think it just gets pushed to updates straight away.

It might help to understand where the above kernel you mention is located
and why you want it...?

Cheers
Chris

-- 
http://www.chruz.com

[Bojan Smojver]

Christopher Brown <snecklifter <at> gmail.com> writes:

>  note that today 2.6.22.4 is out 
When I wrote the e-mail, 2.6.22.3 was the latest version. Anyhow, hopefully will
get .4 instead.

>  It might help to understand where the above kernel you mention is
> located and 
why you want it...?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=13938
http://lwn.net/Articles/245691/

Power savings are always nice :-)

--
Bojan

[Rodd Clarkson]

On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 10:11 +0000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>  Christopher Brown <snecklifter <at> gmail.com> writes:
>  
>  > note that today 2.6.22.4 is out
>  
>  When I wrote the e-mail, 2.6.22.3 was the latest version. Anyhow, hopefully will
>  get .4 instead. 
Just noticed (in passing) that Koji
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/) is building kernel-2.6.22.4-65.fc7

Thought you might like to know.


R.
-- 
"It's a fine line between denial and faith.
 It's much better on my side"

[Bojan Smojver]

Rodd Clarkson <rodd <at> clarkson.id.au> writes:

>  Thought you might like to know. 
Thanks. I think we'll all get .5 instead :-)

--
Bojan

[Bojan Smojver]

Bojan Smojver <bojan <at> rexursive.com> writes:

>  Thanks. I think we'll all get .5 instead  
You know what they say - you should be careful what you wish for. The .3-61
actually appeared in testing today. Go figure...

--
Bojan