Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> writes:
On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote:
> I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained,
Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora.
I just don't understand why it would be OK for EPEL but not for Fedora,
but no matter.
(I don't remember ever being asked to take it over, though a
notification may never have got through to me.)
> but anyhow is it possible just to maintain EPEL branches?
Yes, it is. That was the intention you've stated when you requested
the package to be unorphaned. Why have you requested the f31 branch at
all? It is not needed.
I misunderstood that it was needed.
I recommend you retire on f31 once again and only keep this in epel.
Thanks. I'm rather inclined to do that with other things to avoid