More distgit attached to Fedora Zuul CI ?

[Fabien Boucher]

Hi folks,

I'm forwarding a mail I sent to the Fedora CI mailing list last week, as it
might interest some folks on that mailing list too.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...

---

As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.

Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.

A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos
(the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of
this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
(source datagrepper).

So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
rpms/python3.10 [8].

Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?

We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.

Regards,
Fabien

1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
5 -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9

[Miro Hrončok]

On 11/9/20 10:40 AM, Fabien Boucher wrote:
>  Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
>  
>  We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly. 
+1.

Possibly email the affected maintainers directly once you do this so they know 
what's going on.

-- 
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: [phone]
IRC: mhroncok

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:40:59AM +0000, Fabien Boucher wrote:
>  Hi folks,
>  
>  I'm forwarding a mail I sent to the Fedora CI mailing list last week, as it
>  might interest some folks on that mailing list too.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
>  
>  ---
>  
>  As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
>  packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
>  and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
>  a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
>  various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
>  to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
>  
>  Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
>  Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
>  
>  A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos
>  (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of
>  this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
>  (source datagrepper).
>  
>  So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
>  happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ? 
+1 from me.

Zbyszek

[Fabien Boucher]

Hi Folks,

We are going to add a new list of distgit to Fedora Zuul CI. The
openstack-sig [1] group would like to benefit from this CI for the packages
they maintain.
Here [2] is the Pull-Request we are going to merge with these new distgits
[3].

Like for the previous bundle of distgits we added, we will notify, by
email, maintainers that a CI has been attached to their packages.

Regards,
Fabien

[1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/openstack-sig
[2]: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/119
[3]: https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1899/

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:40 AM Fabien Boucher <fboucher(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi folks,
>
>  I'm forwarding a mail I sent to the Fedora CI mailing list last week, as
>  it might interest some folks on that mailing list too.
>
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
>
>  ---
>
>  As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
>  packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
>  and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
>  a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
>  various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
>  to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
>
>  Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
>  Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
>
>  A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit
>  repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part
>  of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
>  (source datagrepper).
>
>  So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
>  happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
>  Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
>  rpms/python3.10 [8].
>
>  Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
>
>  We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
>
>  Regards,
>  Fabien
>
>  1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
>  2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
>  3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
>  4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
>  5 -
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/...
>  6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
>  7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
>  8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9
>