master branch renaming and fedpkg clone -B

[Richard W.M. Jones]

$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done.
remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.

$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/
f33

This is wrong isn't it?  Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide"
branch
subdirectories have been created?

See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches

Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and
"rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on
the old master branch?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org

[Fabio Valentini]

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
>  Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'...
>  remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
>  remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done.
>  remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
>  Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
>
>  $ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/
>  f33
>
>  This is wrong isn't it?  Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide"
> branch
>  subdirectories have been created?
>
>  See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
>
>  Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and
>  "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on
>  the old master branch?
>
>  Rich. 
If everything is implemented as approved by FESCo, "rawhide" is the
successor for "master", with "main" only being a symbolic reference
pointing at "rawhide".

Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug.

Fabio

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>  On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones
> <rjones(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  > $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
>  > Cloning into bare repository
> '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'...
>  > remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
>  > remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done.
>  > remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
>  > Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  > Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
>  >
>  > $ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/
>  > f33
>  >
>  > This is wrong isn't it?  Shouldn't either "main" or
> "rawhide" branch
>  > subdirectories have been created?
>  >
>  > See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
>  >
>  > Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and
>  > "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on
>  > the old master branch?
>  >
>  > Rich.
>  
>  If everything is implemented as approved by FESCo, "rawhide" is the
>  successor for "master", with "main" only being a symbolic reference
>  pointing at "rawhide".
>  
>  Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug. 
I can't push to either "main" or "rawhide":

$ fedpkg push
Enumerating objects: 5, done.
Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Delta compression using up to 8 threads
Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 412 bytes | 412.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
remote: Unspecified ref refs/heads/rawhide is blocked
remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/rawhide' for user 'rjones'
remote: All changes have been rejected
To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash
 ! [remote rejected] rawhide -> rawhide (pre-receive hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash'
Could not execute push: Failed to execute command.

(Pushing to "main" fails in a similar way)

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:03:56PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>  I can't push to either "main" or "rawhide":
Never mind, I see from Kevin Fenzi's thread above why this has happened.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>  Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug.
I filed a bug:

https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/427

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:53:49PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>  $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
>  Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'...
>  remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
>  remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done.
>  remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
>  Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
>  
>  $ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/
>  f33
>  
>  This is wrong isn't it?  Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide"
> branch
>  subdirectories have been created?
>  
>  See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
>  
>  Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and
>  "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on
>  the old master branch? 
Also:

To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash
 ! [remote rejected] main -> main (pre-receive hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash'

I believe I'm using the latest of everything:

fedpkg-1.40-3.fc34.noarch
python3-fedora-1.1.1-2.fc34.noarch
python3-distro-1.5.0-5.fc34.noarch
python3-rpkg-1.62-2.fc34.noarch

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

[Lubomír Sedlář]

Richard W.M. Jones píše v St 03. 02. 2021 v 13:53 +0000:
>  $ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash
>  Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-
>  hash/rpkg.git'...
>  remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done.
>  remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done.
>  remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
>  Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done.
>  Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
>  
>  $ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/
>  f33
>  
>  This is wrong isn't it?  Shouldn't either "main" or
> "rawhide"
>  branch subdirectories have been created? 
Good catch, that's a bug. This pull request should fix it:
https://pagure.io/fedpkg/pull-request/426

Lubomír

>  See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
>  
>  Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and
>  "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on
>  the old master branch?
>  
>  Rich.
>  
>  -- 
>  Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat 
>  http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
>  Read my programming and virtualization blog: 
>  http://rwmj.wordpress.com
>  libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
>  bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: 
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives: 
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]

[Richard W.M. Jones]

This has been fixed in fedpkg-1.40-4.fc33 - great stuff everyone!

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v