$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'... remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done. remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done. Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/ f33
This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide" branch subdirectories have been created?
See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on the old master branch?
Rich.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com wrote:
$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'... remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done. remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done. Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/ f33
This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide" branch subdirectories have been created?
See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on the old master branch?
Rich.
If everything is implemented as approved by FESCo, "rawhide" is the successor for "master", with "main" only being a symbolic reference pointing at "rawhide".
Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug.
Fabio
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:54 PM Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com wrote:
$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'... remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done. remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done. Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/ f33
This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide" branch subdirectories have been created?
See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on the old master branch?
Rich.
If everything is implemented as approved by FESCo, "rawhide" is the successor for "master", with "main" only being a symbolic reference pointing at "rawhide".
Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug.
I can't push to either "main" or "rawhide":
$ fedpkg push Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 412 bytes | 412.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: Unspecified ref refs/heads/rawhide is blocked remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/rawhide' for user 'rjones' remote: All changes have been rejected To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash ! [remote rejected] rawhide -> rawhide (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash' Could not execute push: Failed to execute command.
(Pushing to "main" fails in a similar way)
Rich.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:03:56PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I can't push to either "main" or "rawhide":
Never mind, I see from Kevin Fenzi's thread above why this has happened.
Rich.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:59:10PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Regarding the "f33" issue, that sounds like a fedpkg bug.
I filed a bug:
https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/427
Rich.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:53:49PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx-hash/rpkg.git'... remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done. remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done. Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/ f33
This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide" branch subdirectories have been created?
See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on the old master branch?
Also:
To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash ! [remote rejected] main -> main (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash'
I believe I'm using the latest of everything:
fedpkg-1.40-3.fc34.noarch python3-fedora-1.1.1-2.fc34.noarch python3-distro-1.5.0-5.fc34.noarch python3-rpkg-1.62-2.fc34.noarch
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones píše v St 03. 02. 2021 v 13:53 +0000:
$ fedpkg clone -B ocaml-ppx-hash Cloning into bare repository '/home/rjones/d/fedora/ocaml-ppx- hash/rpkg.git'... remote: Enumerating objects: 26, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (26/26), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (23/23), done. remote: Total 26 (delta 12), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 Receiving objects: 100% (26/26), done. Resolving deltas: 100% (12/12), done.
$ ls ocaml-ppx-hash/ f33
This is wrong isn't it? Shouldn't either "main" or "rawhide" branch subdirectories have been created?
Good catch, that's a bug. This pull request should fix it: https://pagure.io/fedpkg/pull-request/426
Lubomír
See: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-ppx-hash/branches
Also I'm a bit confused about the difference between "main" and "rawhide" - which one should I use for development that happened on the old master branch?
Rich.
-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
This has been fixed in fedpkg-1.40-4.fc33 - great stuff everyone!
Rich.
-
Fabio Valentini -
Lubomír Sedlář -
Richard W.M. Jones