EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change: Please make sure it's actually a leaf package

[Fabio Valentini]

Hi all,

I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
are* leaf packages:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ostree/c/af0a269 (correctly scoped
to RHEL>=10)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatpak/c/9e4df49 (correctly scoped
to RHEL>=10)
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal/c/93310f7
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/c/940885b
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sssd/c/e0023ec

It looks like at least some of these changes were mistakenly pushed to
Rawhide while they should only apply to ELN / RHEL>=10?

I suspect that these packages dropping i686 support will cause a ton
of build failures during the upcoming mass rebuild.

As the author of the EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal - please
**DO NOT DO IT THIS WAY**. The Change Proposal was about dropping i686
builds from packages that are **LEAF PACKAGES**, not packages that are
somewhere deep in the distro's dependency tree.

Fabio

[Pavel Březina]

On 1/15/24 14:57, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
> dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
> EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
> are* leaf packages:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ostree/c/af0a269 (correctly scoped
> to RHEL>=10)
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatpak/c/9e4df49 (correctly scoped
> to RHEL>=10)
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal/c/93310f7
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/c/940885b
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sssd/c/e0023ec
>
> It looks like at least some of these changes were mistakenly pushed to
> Rawhide while they should only apply to ELN / RHEL>=10?
>
> I suspect that these packages dropping i686 support will cause a ton
> of build failures during the upcoming mass rebuild.
>
> As the author of the EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal - please
> **DO NOT DO IT THIS WAY**. The Change Proposal was about dropping i686
> builds from packages that are **LEAF PACKAGES**, not packages that are
> somewhere deep in the distro's dependency tree.
>
> Fabio

Thank you for checking sssd update.

Is there anything I should do to stop 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-287a88fffd from 
landing in stable or is the negative karma enough?

I don't see "Actions" button to revoke it.

Thanks,
Pavel.

[Miro Hrončok]

On 15. 01. 24 15:09, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Is there anything I should do to stop 
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-287a88fffd from landing in 
> stable or is the negative karma enough?
>
> I don't see "Actions" button to revoke it.

My experience with Bodhi is that the CLI is quite helpful when there is not a 
viable action in the web UI. I run:

bodhi updates request FEDORA-2024-287a88fffd unpush

And it worked.

[Colin Walters]

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, at 8:57 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
> dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
> EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
> are* leaf packages:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99

Yes, this is what started it and we didn't realize the scope.
> It looks like at least some of these changes were mistakenly pushed to
> Rawhide while they should only apply to ELN / RHEL>=10?

Agree, this is the simplest thing to do for now.

[Colin Walters]

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, at 8:57 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
> dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
> EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
> are* leaf packages:
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99

This one should be fixed by https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/c840e7496ad9a0a008903a4cfe5d3...
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal/c/93310f7
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/c/940885b
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sssd/c/e0023ec

I went ahead and pushed changes to these 3.

[Pavel Březina]

On 1/15/24 19:55, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, at 8:57 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've been made aware that there has been a cascade of packages that
> > dropped i686 support in Rawhide, most of them referencing my
> > EncourageI686LeafRemoval Change Proposal, but none of which *actually
> > are* leaf packages:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/b95af99
>
> This one should be fixed by https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/composefs/c/c840e7496ad9a0a008903a4cfe5d3...
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-desktop-portal/c/93310f7
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/c/940885b
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sssd/c/e0023ec
>
> I went ahead and pushed changes to these 3.

Thank you. SSSD build still failed. I think you need to built it in a 
sidetag or wait until the dependencies get into compose.
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue